FAST DISSOLVING ORAL THIN FILMS: A NOVEL
APPROACH FOR DRUG DELIVERY
Khan Juber*
Department of Pharmaceutics, Ali-Allana
College of Pharmacy, Akkalkuwa, Nandurbar, MS, India.
Abstract:
Oral route is the most preferred route of administration for the systemic
effect. Approximately, 60% of all the formulations are solid dosage form,
because of its low-cost and ease of administration increases the patient
compliance. FDDDS were developed for those patients who have difficulty to
swallow the tablets and hard gelatine capsules especially geriatric and
paediatric patients. These dosage form is an alternative to tablet, capsule
and syrups. Mouth dissolving films are more acceptable and accurate oral
dosage form which bypass hepatic first-pass metabolism and provide
therapeutic response by increasing bioavailability. This technology has been used for local action
and quick release of the drug. It is relatively a new dosage
form in which thin film is prepared by using water soluble polymers, which
is rapidly disintegrate or dissolves on tongue or in the oral cavity. The
present study gives aknowledge of different formulations, methods of
preparation and quality control of the fast-dissolving oral thin films.
Keywords: fast
dissolving oral thin films, Patient compliance, First pass metabolism,
hydrophilic polymers.
Key
Words:
|
Article History
Received: 20/12/2022
Revised: 24/12/2022
Accepted: 29/12/2022 Published: 01/01/2023
|
INTRODUCTION
Among the various routes,
the oral route is the most acceptable
for the patientsdue to ease of ingestion, pain avoidance,
versatility (to accommodate various types of drug candidates), and most
importantly, patient compliance also, solid oral delivery systems do not
require sterile conditions and are, therefore, less expensive to manufacture.
Tablet is the most preferred dosage form due to ease of transportation,
manufacturing and more patient compliance.1,2Generally geriatric,
paediatric, bedridden, diarrhoea, sudden episode of allergic attack, coughing,
emetics, emergency(cardiac), patient experience have difficulties in swallowing
the conventional oral dosage form.To overcome this problem a novel formulation
was developed i.e., oral fast dissolving films. These are also useful for local
effect such as local anaesthetic for toothache, oral ulcers, cold sores or
coughing.3 It improve the efficacy of APIs compared to fast
dissolving tablets, by dissolving in the oral cavity after the contact with
less saliva without chewing and no need of water for administration.1,4The
delivery system consists of a thin film, which is placed on the patient’s
tongue or mucosaltissue, instantly wet by saliva; the film rapidly dissolves.
Then, it rapidly disintegrates and dissolves to release the medication for oral
mucosal absorption.2,5,6It improve the efficacy of API within minute
dissolved in oral cavity after contact with saliva without chewing and no need
of water for administration. Fast dissolving action is primarily due to the
large surface area of the film, which wets quickly when exposed to the moisture
environment.2,7The fast-dissolving drug delivery system is specially
designed for the drugs which have extensive first pass metabolism and have low
dose, for the enhancement of bioavailability.
Mouth dissolving films is an ultra-thin film that
employs a hydrophilic polymer that rapidly hydrates or adheres when placed on
the tongue or in the oral cavity. These films disintegrate or dissolve within
seconds to release the active agent without drinking and chewing. There is no
need of water for administration of these dosage form. As the oral mucosa is
highly enriched with blood supply, it provides quick absorption and instant
bioavailability of drugs. The instant bioavailability results from bypassing
first pass metabolism. So, they are generally designed for the drugs having
high first pass metabolism for achieving better bioavailability. The oral
thin-film technology is still in the beginning stages and has bright future
ahead because of patient compliance.
There are some Factors which
are taken into Consideration
·
Drug Lipophilicity.
·
Solubility
·
pH and pKa of saliva.
·
Release of drug from the formulation.
Salient Feature of Fast
Dissolving Drug Delivery System
·
Ease of administration for patients who
are mentally ill disabled and uncooperative.
·
Require no water.
·
Overcomes unacceptable taste of the drugs.
·
Can be designed to leave minimal or no
residue in the mouth after administration and also provide a pleasant mouth
feel.
·
Ability to provide advantages of liquid
medication in the form of solid preparation.
·
Cost effective.
Types of Fast Dissolving
Oral Film
There are three subtypes:
·
Flash release.
·
Mucoadhesive melt release.
·
Mucoadhesive sustained release.
Advantages
·
There is no need of water for
administration.
·
Large surface area of the film provides
rapid disintegration and dissolution in the oral cavity.
·
It should be flexible and light in weight.
·
It is appropriate to all age group.
·
Appropriate for patients who are ill or
uncooperative.
·
Avoiding the risk of choking
·
Avoid first pass metabolism and provide
quicker onset of action at lower doses.
Disadvantages
·
High doses cannot be incorporated.
·
Dose uniformity is a technical challenge.
·
Hygroscopic in nature.
·
Require special packaging for products.
·
Stability and safety.
Ideal Characteristics of
Suitable Drug Candidate
·
The drug should have pleasant taste.
·
The drug to be incorporated have low dose
up to 40 mg.
·
The drugs with smaller and moderate
molecular weight are preferable.
·
The drug should have good stability and
solubility in water as well as in saliva.
·
It should be partially unionized at the pH
of oral cavity.
·
It should have the ability to permeate
oral mucosal tissue.
Standard Composition of
Fast Dissolving Oral Thin Film
It is a thin film having an area of 5-20 cm 2 containing
drug. The drugs can be loaded up to a single dose of 30 mg. From the regulatory
perspectives, all the excipients used in the formulation must be generally
regarded as safe (i.e., GRAS-listed) and must be approved for use in oral
pharmaceutical dosage forms. A typical formulation contains the following
ingredients
·
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient
·
Film Forming Polymer
·
Plasticizer
·
Sweetening Agent
·
Saliva Stimulating Agent
·
Flavouring Agent
·
Colouring Agent
Table 1: concentration of compositions
|
Sr No.
|
Ingredients
|
Concentrations
|
|
1
|
Active
Pharmaceutical Ingredient
|
1-25%
|
|
2
|
Film Forming Polymer
|
40-45%
|
|
3
|
Plasticizer
|
1-20%
|
|
4
|
Sweetening Agent
|
3-6%
|
|
5
|
Saliva
Stimulating Agent
|
2-6%
|
|
6
|
Flavouring Agent
|
5-10%
|
|
7
|
Colouring
Agent
|
0-1%
|
Active Pharmaceutical
Ingredient:
A composition of the film contains 1-25% w/w of the drug.
Variety of APIs can be delivered through fast dissolving films. Small dose
molecules are the best candidates to be incorporated in OFDFs. Multivitamins
upto 10% w/w of dry film weight was incorporated in the films with dissolution
time of less than 60 seconds. It is always useful to have micronized API which
will improve the texture of the film and also for better dissolution and
uniformity in the OFDF. Many APIs, which are potential candidates for OFDF
technology, have bitter taste. This makes the formulation unpalatable
especially for paediatric preparations. Thus, before incorporating the API in
the OFDF, the taste needs to be masked. Various methods can be used to improve
the palatability of the formulation.
Film Forming Polymers:
Water-soluble polymers are used as film formers as they
provide rapid disintegration, good Mouth feel and mechanical strength to the
films. The robustness of the strip depends on the type of polymer and its
amount in the formulations. Watersoluble polymeric film adheres to the buccal
mucosa and rapidly delivers medication into the systemic circulation. Various
polymers are available for preparation of films of which pullulan, gelatine and
Hypromellose are most commonly used. Generally, 45%w/w of polymer should be
present in the total weight of dry film.
Table 2: Film Forming Polymers
|
Natural polymer
|
Synthetic polymer
|
|
Pullulan
|
Hydroxypropyl
methyl cellulose
|
|
Xanthan
gum
|
Polyvinyl
pyrrolidone
|
|
Pectin
|
Polyvinyl
alcohol
|
|
Starch
gelatine
|
Carboxy
methyl cellulose
|
|
Sodium
alginate
|
Poly
ethylene oxide
|
|
Maltodextrin
|
Hydroxypropyl
cellulose
|
|
Polymerized
rosin
|
Kollicoat
|
Ideal Property of Film
Forming Polymers:
·
It should be non-toxic and non-irritant
·
Polymer must be hydrophilic
·
It should have excellent film forming
capacity
·
It should have good wetting and spread
ability property
·
Polymer should be readily available &
should not be very expensive.
·
Polymer should have low molecular weight.
·
It should have sufficient shelf-life.
·
Polymer must be tasteless, colourless.
·
It should not cause any secondary
infection in oral mucosa.
·
It should exhibit adequate peel, shear and
tensile strengths.
Plasticizers:
It is an essential ingredient of the oral films. The
selection of plasticizer depends upon its compatibility with the polymer and
also the type of solvent employed in the casting of film. It improves the
flexibility of the film and reduces the brittleness of the film. The strip
properties of plasticizer are significantly improved by reducing the glass
transition temperature of the polymer. They are used in the concentration of 1 –
20%w/w introduction Department of Pharmaceutics AACOP, Akkalkuwa. 12 of dry polymer
weight. Examples include: Glycerol, propylene glycol, Low molecular weight
polyethylene glycols, Citrate derivatives like triacetin, acetyl citrate,
phthalate derivatives like dimethyl, diethyl, dibutyl derivatives, Castor oil
etc.
Sweetening agents:
Sweeteners have become the important part of the formulation
intended to be disintegrated or dissolved in the oral cavity. Generally,
sweeteners are used in the concentration of 3-6% w/w. both natural and
artificial sweeteners are used in the formulation of these fast-dissolving
films. Polyhydric alcohols such as sorbitol, mannitol, and isomalt can be used
in combination as they additionally provide good mouth feel and cooling
sensation. However, it should be noted that they use of natural sugars in such
preparation need to be restricted in people who all are on diet or in the case
of diabetic patents. Due to this reason, the artificial sweeteners have gained
more popularity in food and pharmaceutical preparations.
The first generation of
the artificial sweeteners are
·
Saccharin
·
Cyclamate
·
Aspartame
Saliva Stimulating
agents:
The purpose of using the saliva stimulating agents is to
increase the rate of production of saliva that would aid in the faster
disintegration of the rapid dissolving stripes formulations. Generally, acids
which are used in the preparation of food can be utilized as salivary
stimulants. Examples are
·
Citric acid
·
Malic acid
·
Lactic acid
·
Ascorbic acid
·
Tartaric acid
These agents are used along are in combination
between 2-6 % w/w of the stripes.
Flavouring agents:
Preferably
upto 10 % w/w flavours is added in the OFDF formulations. The acceptance of
oral disintegrating or dissolving formulation by an individual is largely
depends on the initial flavour quality which is observed in first few seconds
after the product has been consumed and the after taste of the formulation
which lasts for at least about 10 min. The geriatric population like mint or
orange flavours like fruit punch, raspberry etc. it can be selected from
synthetic flavour oils, oleoresins peppermint oil, cinnamon oil, spearmint oil,
oil of nutmeg are the examples of flavour oils while vanilla, cocoa, coffee,
chocolate, and citrus are fruity flavours. Apple, raspberry, cherry, pineapple
are few examples of fruit Essence type.
Colouring agents:
FD&C
approved colouring agents are used (not exceeding con centration levels of 1
percent; w/w) in the manufacturing of orally fast dissolving films. E.g.,
titanium dioxide.
METHODS OF PREPARATION OF FAST DISSOLING
ORAL FILMS
One
or combination of the following process can be used to manufacture the mouth
dissolving films.
·
Solvent casting method
·
Semisolid casting method
·
Hot melt extrusion method
·
Solid dispersion extrusion
·
Rolling method
Solvent Casting Method:
In
this method water soluble polymer and plasticizer are dissolved in the
distilled water. The solution is stirred up for 2 hrs in the magnetic stirrer
and kept aside to remove all the air bubbles entrapped. Then, the other
excipients and API are separately dissolved and stirred well for time of 30
min, after stirring is done both the solutions are mixed together. Finally, the
solution is casted on a suitable flat surface to form a film. The film is dried
and carefully removed.
Fig 1: Diagram of Solvent Casting Film
System
Advantage:
·
Great uniformity of thickness and great
clarity than extrusion.
·
Films have fine gloss & freedom from
defect such a die liner.
·
Films have more flexibility & better
physical properties.
Semisolid Casting Method:
In
the semisolid casting method firstly a solution of film forming polymer is
prepared. The resulting solution is added to a solution of acid insoluble
polymerwhich was prepared in ammonium or sodium hydroxide. Then appropriate
amount of plasticizer is added so toast a gel mass is obtained. Finally, the
gel mass is casted into the films or ribbons using heat-controlled drums. The
thickness of the film is about 0.15-0.5 inches. The ratio of the acid insoluble
polymer to film forming polymer should be 1:4. Both mixtures are mixed to form
homogenous viscous solution degassed under vacuum. Bubble free solution is
coated on non-treated casting film coated film is sent to aeration drying oven.
Film is cutting into desired shape and size.
Hot Melt Extrusion:
In
the hot melt extrusion method firstly, the drug is mixed with carriers in solid
form. Then the extruder having heaters melts the mixture. Finally, the melt is
shaped in to films by the dies. There are certain benefits of hot melt
extrusion method:
·
Fewer operation units
·
Better content uniformity
·
An anhydrous process
Fig 2: Diagram of Hot Melt Extrusion
Method
Solid Dispersion Extrusion:
Solid
dispersion refers to the dispersion of two or more active ingredients in an
inert carrier in the presence of amorphous hydrophilic polymers in solid state.
The API is dissolved in suitable solvent and incorporated into PEG. The drug
and solvents are immiscible in nature. Solid dispersions are then shaped into
films by means of dies.
Rolling Method:
In
rolling method, a solution or suspension of drug with film forming polymer is
prepared and subjected to the roller. The solution or suspension should have
specific rheological consideration. The solvent is mainly water and mixture of
water and alcohol. The film is dried on the rollers and cutted in to desired
shapes and sizes. ble flat surface to form a film. The film is dried and
carefully removed.
EVALUATION OF FAST-DISSOLVING ORAL FILMS
Prepared films are evaluated for following
parameters.
1.
Organoleptic Evaluation:
As
the film disintegrates in the oral cavity, it should have acceptable
organoleptic characteristics like colour, flavour and taste.
2.
Weigh of Films:
Mouths
dissolving oral films were weighed on analytical balance and average weight can
be determined for each film. It is desirable that films should have nearly
constant weight. It is useful fordetermine the proper amount of excipients and
API.
3.
Thickness of Films:
By
using micrometer screw gauge, the thickness of the film was measured at five
different places; an average of three values was calculated. This is essential
to ascertain uniformity in the thickness of the film this is directly related
to the accuracy of dose in the film.
4.
Folding Endurance:
To
determine folding endurance, a strip of film is cut and repeatedly folded at
the same place till it broke. The number of times the film could be folded at
the same place without breaking gives the value of folding endurance. Typical
folding endurance for film is between 100-150.
5.
Tensile Strength:
Tensile
strength is the maximum stress applied to a point at which the strip specimen
breaks. It is calculated by formula,
6.
Percent Elongation:
When
stress is applied to a film sample it stretches and this is referred as strain.
Strain is basically the deformation of film divided by original dimension of the
sample. Generally, elongation of film increases as the plasticizer content
increases.
It
is calculated by formula,
7.
Surface pH:
The
film to be tested was placed in a Petri dish and was moistened with 0.5 ml of
distilled water and kept for 30 s. The pH was noted after bringing the
electrode of the pH meter in contact with the surface of the formulation and
allowing equilibration for 1 min. The average of three determinations for each
formulation was done.
8.
In Vitro Disintegration Test:
Disintegration
time is the time when an oral film starts breaking when brought in contact with
water or saliva. For a fast-dissolving film, the time of disintegration should
be in range of 5-30s. United State Pharmacopoeia (USP) disintegration apparatus
can be used to study Disintegration time. In another method, the disintegration
time can be visually determined by dipping the film in 25 ml water in a beaker.
The beaker should be shaken gently and the time was noted when the film starts
to breaks or disintegrates.
9.
Drug Content Uniformity:
This
is determined by any standard assay method described for the particular API in
any of the standard pharmacopoeia. Content uniformity is determined by estimating
the API content in individual strip. Limit of content uniformity is 85-115%.
10.
In-Vitro Drug Release Study:
By
this method cumulative drug release and cumulative percentage of drug retained
were calculated. In-vitro drug dissolution was performed using USP paddle type
apparatus. The studies were carried out at 37°C with stirring speed of 75 rpm
in 500 ml phosphate buffer (pH 6.8). 5 ml of samples were withdrawn at
predetermined time intervals of 3, 6, 9…, 30 min and replaced with the same
volume of buffer. The samples were collected and the concentration was
determined at appropriate wavelength using UV-visible spectrophotometer.
11.
Stability Testing:
Stability
measurement is done by storing the of oral strip were stored under controlled
conditions of 25ºC/60% RH as well as 40°C/75% over a period of 3 months in
stability chamber according to the ICH guideline. During storage period various
evaluating parameter like thickness, morphological properties, tensile
strength, water content and dissolution behaviour are checked.
CONCLUSION
The fast-dissolving oral thin films are
considered as the novel work in the pharmaceutical field, this approach of
delivery system is best suited for geriatric, paediatric and psychiatric
patients who have difficulty in swallowing, so this approach exhibits less risk
and improved patient compliance with higher safety. Since FDOF’s bypasses the
hepatic metabolism, its ease of administration and requires no water at the
time of drug administration makes this delivery a unique one, and improves the
therapeutic response significantly.
REFERENCES
1.
Anjum Pathan, Mahesh Kumar Gupta, Neetesh
Kumar Jain, Ankita Dubey, Ankit Agrawal, Formulation and evaluation of fast
dissolving oral film of promethazine hydrochloride using different surfactant,
JIPBS, Vol 3 (1), 2016 P. No. 74-84.
2. Arun
Arya, Amrish Chandra, Vijay Sharma and Kamla Pathak, Fast Dissolving Oral
Films: An Innovative Drug Delivery System and Dosage Form, International
Journal of ChemTech Research, Vol.2, No.1, Jan-Mar 2010, 576-583.
3. Basani
Gavaskar, Subash Vijaya Kumar1, Guru Sharan1, Y. Madhusudan Rao, Overview on
Fast Dissolving Films, Int J Pharmacy and Pharm Sci, Vol 2, Issue 3, 2933.
4. Bhabani
Shankar Nayak, Subham Sourajit, Manaswini Palo, Subhasmita Behera, Sublingual
Drug Delivery System: A Novel Approach, International Journal of Pharmaceutics
& Drug Analysis Vol.5 Issue 10, 2017; 399 – 405.
5. Devendra
Singh Lodhi, Megha Verma, Pradeep Golani, Pradeep Patra, Sanjay Nagdev and
Akash Singh Pawar, Fast-dissolving oral film of anti-migraine drug: A review,
National Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2021; 1(2): 40-48.
6. Hithun
Devaraj, Senthil Venkatachalam and Arun Radhakrishnan, A Review on Formulation
of Oral Dissolving Film, Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2018,
10(4): 151-159.
7. Julie
Mariam Joshua, R Hari, Fithal K Jyothish, Saritha A Surendran, Fast Dissolving
Oral Thin Films: An Effective Dosage Form for Quick Releases, Int. J. Pharm.
Sci. Rev. Res., 38(1), May – June 2016; Article No. 50, Pages: 282-289.
8. Kaur
Mandeep, A.C. Rana, Seth Nimrata, Fast Dissolving Films: An Innovative Drug
Delivery System, International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research & Allied
Sciences, Volume 2, issue 1 (2013), 14-24.
9. M.D.
Nehal Siddiqui, Garima Garg and Pramod Kumar Sharma, A Short Review on A Novel
Approach in Oral Fast Dissolving Drug Delivery System and Their Patents,
Advances in Biological Research 5 (6): 2011, 291-30.
10. Naga
Sowjanya Juluru, Fast Dissolving Oral Films: A Review, International Journal of
Advances in Pharmacy, Biology and Chemistry, Vol. 2(1), Jan- Mar, 2013,
108-112.
11. Nishi
Thakur, Mayank Bansal, Neha Sharma, Ghanshyam Yadav and Pragati Khare, Overview
A Novel Approach of Fast Dissolving Films and Their Patients, Advances in
Biological Research 7 (2):2013, 50-58.
12. Pallavi
Patil, S. K. Shrivastava, Fast Dissolving Oral Films: An Innovative Drug
Delivery System, International Journal of Science and Research, Volume 3 Issue
7, July 2014, 2088-2093.
13. Pandya
Ketul, K. R. Patel, M. R. Patel, N. M. Patel, Fast Dissolving Films: A Novel
Approach to Oral Drug Delivery, International Journal of Pharmacy Teaching
& Practices 2013, Vol.4, Issue 2, 655-661. 655.
14. R.P.
Dixit, S.P. Puthli, Oral strip technology: Overview and future potential,
Journal of Controlled Release 139 (2009) 94–107.
15. Sandeep
Karki, Hyeongmin Kim, Seon-Jeong Na, Dohyun Shin, Kanghee Jo, Jaehwi Lee, Thin
films as an emerging platform for drug delivery, Asian Journal of
Pharmaceutical Sciences 11 (2016) 559–574.
16. Shruti
C Prabhu, Sarvesh D Parsekar, Amitha Shetty, Samuel S Monteiro, Mohd Azharuddin
and AR. Shabaraya, A Review on Fast Dissolving Sublingual Films for Systemic
Drug Delivery, International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Chemical Sciences,
Vol. 3 (2) Apr-Jun 2014, 501-511.
17. T.
Usha Kiran Reddy, K. Sunil Kumar Reddy, Katta. Manogna, Prof. K. Thyagaraju, A
Detailed Review on Fast Dissolving Oral Films, Indo American Journal of
Pharmaceutical Research, Vol 8 Issue 06, 2018, 1315-1326.
18. Tarjani
S Naik, Anubha Khale, Hema Kanekar, Evaluation of Mouth Dissolving Films:
Physical and Chemical Methods, International Journal of Pharmaceutical and
Phytopharmacological Research, 2014; 4 (1): 62-65.