High Throughput Protein Analysis Enabled by
IR, MALDI, ESI, MS
Pathan
Najiya Shahnoor*, Sayyad Simran Shabbir, Shaikh Sadiya Mehmood, Ansari
Shaheenanjum Babuddin, Dr. Aejaz Ahmed, Dr. G. J.
Khan.
J.I.I.U' S Ali Allana College of
Pharmacy Akkalkuwa, Dist. Nandurbar (425415), Maharashtra, India
Abstract: With
the introduction of soft ionization techniques such as Matrix Assisted
Laser Desorption Ionization (MALDI), and Electrospray Ionization (ESI),
proteins have become accessible for mass spectrometric analyses. Since
then, mass spectrometry has emerged as the preferred technique for
identifying proteins and peptides at a low cost, with high reliability and
sensitivity. With a growing number of complete genome sequences available
for a wide range of organisms and multiple protein databases built from
them, mass spectrometry can now identify proteins with high throughput.
This Review discusses the suitability of strategies for automated data
analysis and provides a brief overview of methods for identifying
posttranslational modifications, highlighting the various mass spectrometric
techniques currently used in proteome research.
In
the biopharmaceutical sector, mass spectrometry (MS) is the main analytical
method used to identify proteins. The gold standard method for analysing
intact proteins is to combine liquid chromatography with electrospray
ionisation (ESI). Nevertheless, speed constraints make it impossible to
analyse big sample sizes (>1000) in a single day. On a high throughput
IR-MALDESI-MS system, proteins as small as 150 kDa can be detected, and we
have assessed the impact of the matrix on the signal. Up to 22 protein
samples can be analysed by the system in a single second. Applications
include compound modifications to a probe protein, compound binding
kinetics, and protein autophosphorylation. A cysteine modification site was
found using top-down protein sequencing.
Keywords:. Mass
spectrometry, ESI (Electrospray Ionization), MALDI (Matrix Assisted Laser
Desorption Ionization)
|
Article History
Received: 15/09/2023
Revised: 02/10/2023
Accepted: 24/10/2023 Published: 06/11/2023
|
INTRODUCTION
Mass
spectrometry (MS) is a widely used technique for analysing chemical structures
in quantities down to trace levels. It was first developed in 1905. Proteins
were unavailable for mass spectrometry analysis for many years due to
inadequate ionisation methods for large biomolecules. Since the advent of soft
ionisation methods like Electrospray Ionisation (ESI) and Matrix Assisted Laser
Desorption Ionisation (MALDI) at the close of the 1980s, protein analysis by
mass spectrometry has rapidly advanced. Simultaneously, a growing number of
complete genome sequences for diverse organisms have become accessible, and
multiple protein databases have been built using this data. High-quality,
well-annotated protein databases provided the foundation for high-throughput
protein identification using mass spectrometry. [12].
Many different types of mass spectrometric instrumentation, such as MALDI-TOF,
ESI-Q-TOF, ESI-ion trap, MALDI-TOF/TOF, ESI-FT-ICR, etc., have been created by
combining different types of mass analyzers in a modular arrangement with
MALDI- or ESI. While the primary structure of a protein could be determined
using each of these MS techniques, additional sample preparation methods were
always needed. Moreover, it is now feasible to analyse posttranslational
modifications like glycosylation and phosphorylation. High sensitivity, mass
accuracy, mass resolution, fast analysis, and sophisticated data handling are
now combined in system-dependent mass spectrometers.In addition to these
technical aspects in mass spectrometry, greatly improved sample separation and
preparation techniques have also led to enhanced sensitivity. The
quantification of chemically or metabolically labeled proteins is yet another
focus of interest in mass spectrometry. Despite these advances, current MS
approaches still have limitations and are therefore subject to further
development. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the
various mass spectrometric techniques currently used in proteome research, as
well as to discuss the suitability of these techniques for protein
quantification strategies. The methods for identifying post-translational
modifications are briefly discussed. [13].
General
technical considerations:
A
very precise and sensitive technique for figuring out the molecular masses of
various kinds of molecules is mass spectrometry. Every typical mass
spectrometer is made up of three main parts:
Ø The
ion source ionizes the analyte.
Ø The
mass analyzer separates the resulting ions according to their mass-to-charge
ratio (m/z).
Ø The
ion detector, whose signals can be recorded and processed by a computer.
Fig.1: MALDI TOF Mass
Spectrometer
This
order indicates the direction of the ion's passage through a typical mass
spectrometer.13] There are various designs available for each mass spectrometer
unit, and they can all be set up in a variety of ways. For mass spectrometers
in Specifically, various unit configurations can be integrated into a single
mass.The spectrometer. For example, the coupling of two mass selective devices
for tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) has expanded the field’s application
enormously, resulting in a profusion of experimental setups and designs in
modern protein analyzing mass spectrometers. For a better understanding of the
variety of instrumentation, a brief introduction to the functional principles
of the most common designs is essential.
Ion
sources:
The
purpose of the ion source is to produce analyte ions and move them into the gas
phase so they can enter the mass spectrometer's vacuum. Loss or gain of charge
(such as electron capture, electron ejection, protonation, deprotonation, or
cationization) produces the ions. Prior to the development of MALDI and ESI
ionisation, electron ionisation (EI) was the most widely used ionisation
technique for mass analysis. Due to the volatility of large biomolecules in a
vacuum by thermal desorption, the electron ionisation technology is limited to
compounds with masses well below the range of peptides and proteins.
Nevertheless, routine analysis of small molecules still heavily relies on
electron ionisation.
The
First Protein identification using mass spectrometry:
Although
there are still a number of restrictions, methods like fast atom bombardment
(FAB) and plasma desorption have been successful in producing a biomolecule
ionisation that is satisfactory. The advent of "soft" ionisation
techniques in mass spectrometry, such as MALDI and ESI, has the potential to
address issues related to thermal decomposition and excessive fragmentation of
large biomolecules, like peptides. In both situations, the analyte is firstly
protonated in a liquid phase and then augmented with a proton donor (such as an
organic acid) to achieve ionisation.
ESI: (Electrospray ionization)
Using
varying amounts of an aqueous sample at atmospheric pressure, charged molecules
are introduced into the mass spectrometer equipped with ESI sources. For
instance, in nano electrospray (nanoES) technology, a metal-coated glass
needle's highly charged tip (up to 3,000 V) can be sprayed with a small amount
of sample all the way to the mass spectrometer's inlet (Fig. 2). Strong
electric field produced by the finely pointed nozzle helps to accelerate
charged droplets and create a continuous spray of 20–200 nL/min. After the
solvent evaporates, which is often assisted by a dry gas, the solvent-free
ionised analyte molecules are eventually released by decreasing the droplet
size and raising the surface charge density. In this case, organic solvents
like acetonitrile or 2-propanol help to create a stable spray by speeding up
the evaporation process. To create an ion beam, the resultant ions are guided
through an aperture and electrostatically focused step-by-step under increasing
vacuum conditions. The principal product of the ESI process is multiply charged
molecules. It is shown that solvents more volatile than water affect the
maximum charge states and charge state distributions of ions produced by
electrospray ionisation.
MALDI
(Matrix Assisted Laser desorption/Ionization):
Using
the ionisation technique known as MALDI spectrometry, one can accurately
determine the molecular mass of polar biopolymers with molecular masses ranging
from a few thousand to several hundred thousand Da. In 1988, the technique was
initially presented almost simultaneously by two research teams—one from
Germany and the other from Japan. For MALDI, commercial instrumentation is
available. The MALDI technique involves uniformly dispersing a low
concentration of analyte in a solid or liquid matrix and depositing it on a
metal plate or the end of a stainless steel probe. After that, the plate is put
inside a vacuum chamber, and the sample is targeted by a laser beam [5]. Apart
from the standard MALDI conducted in a vacuum chamber, an atmospheric version
has also been reported. The laser radiation must be thoroughly absorbed by the
MALDI Matrix. An ion plume is then produced by desorbed and ionising the matrix
and analyte. The time of flight (TOF) analyzer is the most popular kind of mass
analyzer used with MALDI. a mass spectrum obtained using a MALDI-TOF device. In
this instance, the analyte was a monoclonal antibody from a mouse with a
molecular mass of roughly 150,000 Da, and the matrix material was nicotinic
acid.
)
Fig.2 Electrospray
Ionization (ESI
Note
that the Spectrum is characterized by very low background noise and a complete
absence of fragmentation of the large analyte ion. Multiply charged ions are
present as well as peaks for dimer and trimer species. Though the exact
mechanism underlying the formation of the MALDI ion plume is unknown, it is
believed to entail the Matrix absorbing the laser beam and then transferring
that energy to the analyte. The analyte and the matrix then undergo
desorption.The analyte is thought to desorb as natural molecules and then to be
ionized by proton-transfer reactions with a protonated matrix. A series of
photochemical reactions may produce protonated matrix ions. Along with the
laser wavelengths that have been used. Lasers used include Nitrogen (337 nm)
Nd-YAG (266 and 355 nm), excimer (308 nm), Er-YAG(2.94µm), and CO2
(10.6µm). The most common Sample preparation method is the dried-droplet
technique in which the droplet of the Matrix containing the analyte is
deposited on the metal plate and then dried. Typically, the ratio of analyte to
Matrix is 1:103 to 1:105. Analyte concentrations are
usually in the micromolar range. Recently, The MALDI Technique has been
extended to imaging methods by scanning a localized laser beam over the
dispersed sample. A mass spectral variety of biopolymers has been obtained in
this manner.
1.
Mass analyzers:
i.
Time of Flight (TOF):
Mass
analyzer an attractive feature of the TOF mass spectrometer is its graspable
design. The mass analysis simply involves measuring the flight time of the ions
on their way through the field-free-drift region in a flight tube after
acceleration. The m/z values of the ions in the analyzer tube determine their
velocity.The greater the m/z, the lower the speed and the longer the time
needed to travel the distance to the detector [3]. Unfortunately, for a simple
linear tube design, the mass resolution is relatively poor due to the
inevitable initial energy spread from the evaporation process.
Fig.3: Matrix-Assisted
Laser Desorption/Ionization (MALDI TOF)
The
reflectron, which is at the end of the flight tube and compensates for
fuzziness in flight times by focusing ions with the same m/z in space and time
before they hit the detector, was introduced to eliminate this disadvantage
(Fig. 3). Therefore, it is easy to achieve high resolution up to 25,000 with a
reflectron TOF mass analyzer design. The post-source decay (PSD) technique,
which makes use of the fact that some of the MALDI-generated ions experience
metastable decay during flight through the mass analyzer, is another feature of
MALDI-TOF instruments.For simple reflectron MALDI-TOF devices, a composite PSD
mass spectrum is generated stepwise due to the kinetic energy range-dependent
focusing potential. However, modern MALDI TOF-TOF-MS devices provide a faster
and more precise MS/MS-spectrum generation comparable with other common
tandem-MS devices [3].
ii.
Quadrupole (Q or Quad) mass analyser:
The m/z-dependent
trajectory of ions in an alternating radio frequency field forms the basis of
the quadrupole mass filter concept. Two pairs of rod electrodes that focus ions
in two dimensions—that is, two axes—create the oscillating field. To reach the
active attracting electrode, the ions are accelerated alternately. A portion of
the ions with a particular m/z value are stabilised in between the electrodes
at any given field oscillation of the amplitude and frequency, while the
majority of ions are discarded. Quadrupole mass analyzers are therefore
referred to as mass filters. Ions can either drift through a third dimension as
in quadrupole mass filters or be trapped in an ion trap with various electrode
designs. The scanning mass gate's range is heavily dependent on field
modulation. An increase in the mass window causes more of the selected ions to
travel through the analyzer on stable trajectories, which boosts signal but
lowers resolution. Tandem MS with quadrupole mass analyzers is frequently
performed using the triple quadrupole (triple quad) and Q-TOF mass spectrometer
setups.
Fig.4 Mass Analysers
Ø TOF:
Certain time-of-flight reflectron analyzers offer high mass resolution and can
perform LIFT- or PSD-tandem MS.
Ø Ion
Trap:
Although the Paul ion trap typically has poor mass resolution and accuracy, it
can conduct MSn experiments quickly.
Ø Quad:
Tandem mass spectrometry with high mass accuracy can be accomplished with a
collision cell and multiple quadrupole mass filters.
Ø LIT:
A combination of an ion trap analyzer (connecting arrows) and a quadruple
simplifies linear ion traps while improving overall performance. It can hold
ions in strings within the end caps.
Ø Orbitrap:
It can be regarded as an extremely well-resolved and accurately mass-measured
modified ion trap.
iii.
FT-ICR:
Of all the devices that are currently on the market, this mass analyzer offers
the best mass accuracy and the highest resolution power. There are numerous
ways to combine these analyzers with ion sources, detectors, and each other.
iv.
Ion trap mass analyzer:
The ion trap functions similarly to a
quadrupole analyzer in theory; the only distinction is that the electrode
assembly of the ion trap traps the ions in three dimensions. A compact ring
electrode and two end-cap electrodes define the trapping volume for specific
ions. Ion trap analyzers operate at a higher level of sophistication because
they can perform complex mass analyses using multiple gate drives. A triple
quadrupole mass spectrometer and an ion trap device operate similarly in many
aspects. The ion trap conducts each operation sequentially in a single device
that is only separated in time, whereas the triple quad performs ion selection,
collisional dissociation, and mass analysis in three aligned mass analyzers
that are separated in both time and space. The cap on the quantity of ions that
can be trapped is a significant flaw in the ion trap design. More ions can be
seen to deviate from their expected behaviour and interact with one another
more—for example, by repelling one another when their charges are identical—the
more ions are contained within the ion trap's small volume. Excessively high
ion density directly results in a significant loss of mass accuracy and
resolution. To guarantee that an appropriate quantity of ions is captured
during each scan, extra scanning and control methods are needed to account for
this "space charge" phenomenon. Usually, 0.5 amu can be fixed with
ease if "space charging" is reduced. An MS/MS spectrum can be
produced by scanning the fragment ions out of the trap after collision-induced
dissociation (CID). Ion trap instruments (MSn) can typically be used to perform
additional MS stages if necessary. However, depending on the ion yields from
earlier experiments, n is typically less than 7. Ion trap mass analyzers have many
benefits, including robustness, flexibility, sensitivity, fast scanning rates,
and relatively low costs.
Orbitrap:
The Orbitrap can be thought of as a highly
modified ion trap, even though it uses constant electrostatic fields instead of
the oscillating electric field used in the ion trap (Fig. 4). The Orbitrap's
electrode geometry is an entirely new design that has an electrode in the
centre that resembles a spindle and an extended circular outer barrel. The
combined quadro-logarithmic electro-static potential produced by these axially
symmetric electrodes results in stable ion trajectories around the central
electrode and concurrent axial oscillation. The Orbitrap design can be used
with both MALDI and ESI sources and offers a high dynamic range, high mass
accuracy (2-4 ppm), and high resolution (up to 150,000). While various
laboratories are currently examining the Orbitrap's suitability for tandem mass
spectrometry, this new breed of high-resolution mass analyzer has the potential
to become a more affordable option than FT-ICR-MS equipment. Unfortunately,
there are currently not enough real-world data to assess how Orbitrap
instruments will affect mass spectrometric protein analysis in the future.
v.
Fourier Transform-Ion Cyclotron
Resonance (FT-ICR) mass analyzer:
The analysis of proteins and peptides derived
from MS samples is greatly impacted by this intelligent kind of mass analyzer.
Compared to other mass spectrometer designs that are presently on the market,
FT-ICR-MS provides a higher mass accuracy and resolution. The high performance
of the FT-ICR analyzer is a result of the analyte ions being trapped in a
mixture of strong magnetic and electric fields (Fig. 4). In the presence of a
uniform static magnetic field, ions trapped by a static electric field are
confined to circular orbits. The m/z of the ion and the strength of the
magnetic field determine the frequency of the circular motion, or cyclotron
frequency. The momentum of the ions in the plane perpendicular to the magnetic
field determines the radius of this circular motion. Ions can therefore be
contained for extended periods of time in high vacuum, and cyclotron frequency
detection and ion excitation can be repeated. This method enables the
simultaneous, non-destructive acquisition of all ions' spectra using a
broadband amplifier after the ions have been detected. A complete mass spectrum
with extremely high mass accuracy can be obtained by Fourier transformation of
the induced image current signals. Regretfully, FT-ICR-MS performance improves
in all respects at higher magnetic fields, which are typically generated by
superconducting magnets. Presently accessible superconducting magnetic
materials usually require operation at very low temperatures.
3.
Ion detectors:
Destructive ion detection is the standard
method for registering incoming ions from the various mass Protein
identification using mass spectrometry, with the exception of the Orbitrap and
the FT-ICR instruments: An analysis technique. Microchannel plate (MCP)
detectors or secondary electron multipliers (SEM) are commonly used to detect
ions. Typically, the detector produces secondary electrons that are amplified
further, allowing the mass spectrometer to produce an analogue signal. A
computer finally digitises and processes the analogue signal from the detector.
There are a number of other ion detection designs and applications in use, such
as photon-sensitive detectors, but they are outside the purview of this review.
2.
Instrumentation of MALDI-MS:
The MALDI technology has multiple variants, and similar
instruments are now manufactured for radically different uses. From higher
throughput and more industrial to more academic and analytical. The field of
mass spectrometry has grown to the point where more high-throughput instruments
and ultrahigh resolution mass spectrometry, like the FT-ICR instruments, are
needed. Since a variety of interchangeable ionisation sources (electrospray,
MALDI, atmospheric pressure, etc.) are available for purchase with many MALDI
MS instruments, there is often overlap between the
technologies and the potential to use any soft ionisation technique.
Fig.5
MALDI MS Components
i.
Laser:
UV
lasers such as nitrogen lasers (337 nm) and frequency-tripled and quadrupled
Nd:YAG lasers (355 nm and 266 nm, respectively) are commonly used in MALDI
techniques.
The
mid-IR optical parametric oscillator, the 10.6 μm carbon dioxide laser, and the
2.94 μm Er: YAG laser are examples of infrared laser wavelengths used for
infrared MALDI. Because of their softer mode of ionisation, infrared lasers are
used, despite being less common. More material removal (good for biological
samples), reduced low-mass interference, and interoperability with other
matrix-free laser desorption mass spectrometry techniques are further benefits
of IR-MALDI.
ii.
Time of flight:
The
time-of-flight mass spectrometer (TOF) is the most popular mass spectrometer
type when used with MALDI, primarily because of its wide mass range. Since the
pulsed laser fires in discrete "shots" as opposed to continuously,
the TOF measurement technique is also perfectly adapted to the MALDI ionisation
process. A reflectron, also known as a "ion mirror," is frequently
included with MALDI-TOF instruments. It uses an electric field to reflect ions.
By lengthening the ion flight path, this improves resolution by lengthening the
time between ions with different m/z [4].
Resolving
power m/Δm of contemporary commercial reflectron TOF instruments can attain
50,000 FWHM (full-width half-maximum) or higher. Δm is defined as the peak
width at 50% of peak height.
To
distinguish between phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated peptides, MALDI and
IMS-TOF MS have been combined. It has been shown that MALDI-FT-ICR MS is a
helpful method when high-resolution MALDI-MS measurements are required.
Fig.6 TOF: Sample target for a MALDI mass spectrometer
iii. Atmospheric
pressure:
The ionisation method known
as matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MAPLDI) at atmospheric pressure
(AP) functions in a typical atmospheric environment as opposed to a vacuum.
Vacuum MALDI and AP-MALDI differ primarily in the pressure at which the ions
are produced. Ions are usually generated at 10 mTorr or less in vacuum MALDI,
whereas atmospheric pressure is reached in AP-MALDI. The primary drawback of
the AP-MALDI method in the past when compared to traditional vacuum MALDI has
been its low sensitivity; nevertheless, attomole detection limits have been
documented, and ions can be transferred into the mass spectrometer with great
efficiency. Mass spectrometry (MS) uses AP-MALDI for a number of purposes, from
proteomics to drug discovery. Proteomics, the mass analysis of DNA, RNA, PNA,
lipids, oligosaccharides, phosphopeptides, bacteria, small molecules, and
synthetic polymers are among the common topics covered by AP-MALDI mass
spectrometry. Similar applications are also possible with vacuum MALDI
instruments. An ion trap mass spectrometer or any other MS system with an
electrospray ionisation (ESI) or nano ESI source can be readily connected to
the AP-MALDI ion source [4]. It is known that singly-charged ions are the
primary product of MALDI ionisation at low pressure (see "Ionisation mechanism"
below). On the other hand, ionisation at atmospheric pressure has the ability
to produce highly charged analytes, as demonstrated by infrared and
subsequently nitrogen lasers. The ability to measure high-molecular-weight
compounds like proteins in instruments that only offer smaller m/z detection
ranges, like quadrupoles, makes multiple charging of analytes crucial. In
addition to pressure, the matrix's composition plays a crucial role in
producing this outcome.
iv.
Aerosol:
One method of ionisation
used in aerosol mass spectrometry involves aiming a laser at individual
droplets. Single-particle mass spectrometers (SPMS) are the systems that go by
this name. Before being aerosolized, the sample may optionally be combined with
a MALDI matrix.
§
Ionization mechanism:
In the dried-droplet spot,
the matrix crystals are targeted by the laser beam. The laser energy is
absorbed by the matrix, and it is believed that this event primarily desorbed
and ionises (by adding a proton). Numerous species can be found in the hot
plume created by ablation, including matrix clusters, nanodroplets, neutral and
ionised matrix molecules, and matrix molecules that have been protonated and
deprotonated. Analyte ionisation may involve delayed species, however the MALDI
mechanism is still up for discussion. It is then believed that the matrix
charges the analyte by transferring protons to the analyte molecules (such as
protein molecules). An ion that is seen after this procedure is made up of the
original neutral molecule [M] plus any ions that have been added or subtracted.
Quasimolecular ions are those that have an added proton (for example, [M+H] +,
[M+Na] +, or [M-H] −), or an added sodium ion (for example, [M+Na] +).
Depending on the type of matrix, the laser's intensity, and/or the voltage
applied, MALDI can produce singly charged ions or multiply charged ions ([M+nH]
n+). Keep in mind that every species listed here has an even number of
electrons. For example, in the case of matrix molecules and other organic
molecules, ion signals of radical cations (photoionized molecules) can be
observed [4]. Primary and secondary processes leading to ionisation are
postulated by the gas phase proton transfer model, which is implemented as the
coupled physical and chemical dynamics (CPCD) model of UV laser MALDI. The two
main processes are the initial charge separation caused by the matrix absorbing
photons and the energy pooling that results in the formation of matrix ion
pairs. Primary ion formation is the result of a UV photon being absorbed, which
produces excited state molecules by
S0 + hν →
S1
S1 + S1 →
S0 + Sn
S1 + Sn →
M+ + M−
in which Sn is a higher electronic excited
state, S0 is the ground electronic state, and S1 is the first electronic
excited state. Proton transfer or electron transfer ion pairs, denoted by M+
and M− above, can be the product ions. Ion-molecule interactions take place in
secondary processes to create analyte ions.
Fig.7
(Ionization Mechanism) In the lucky survivor model, positive ions can be formed
from highly charged clusters produced during the break-up of the matrix- and
analyte-containing solid.
The cluster ionisation
mechanism, also known as the lucky survivor model, proposes that analyte
molecules are integrated into the matrix while retaining their charge state
from the solution. When laser-ablated clusters break apart, charge separation
leads to the formation of ions. The so-called lucky survivors are ions that are
not neutralised by recombination with photoelectrons or counter ions. According
to the thermal model, in melted matrix liquid, the high temperature promotes
proton transfer between matrix and analyte. The ion-to-neutral ratio is a
crucial parameter for the theoretical model's justification, and its incorrect
citation could lead to an incorrect assessment of the ionisation mechanism. The
ion-to-neutral ratio as a function of laser fluences and the rise in total ion
intensity as a function of analyte concentration and proton affinity are both
quantitatively predicted by the model. Additionally, this model implies that
the primary source of metal ion adducts (such as [M+Na] + or [M+K] +) is the
thermally induced dissolution of salt.
Analyte ions of volatile or
non-volatile compounds can be produced using the matrix-assisted ionisation
(MAI) method without the need for laser ablation, thanks to matrix preparation
techniques similar to those of MALDI. Electrospray ionisation produces ions
with nearly identical charge states to those produced by simply subjecting the
matrix containing the analyte to the mass spectrometer's vacuum. It is
suggested that this process and MALDI probably share some mechanistic
similarities.
The usual estimate for ion
yield is between 10−4 and 10−7, however some experiments suggest even lower
yields of 10−9. Shortly after MALDI was introduced, attempts had been made to
address the problem of low ion yields, including post-ionization using a second
laser. The majority of these efforts had poor signal increases and only patchy
success. This could be explained by the use of axial time-of-flight
instruments, which expand the plume rapidly with particle velocities of up to
1000 m/s, operating at pressures in the source region of 10−5 to 10−6.
Using a modified MALDI
source operated at an elevated pressure of approximately 3 mbar coupled to an
orthogonal time-of-flight mass analyzer, successful laser post-ionization was
reported in 2015. The laser used was wavelength-tunable, operating at a
wavelength of 260 nm to 280 nm, below the two-photon ionisation threshold of
the matrices used. This resulted in an increase of up to three orders of
magnitude in the ion yields of several lipids and small molecules. Because of
the second laser and the second MALDI-like ionisation process, this
method—known as MALDI-2—was later adopted by other mass spectrometers that had
low bar operating sources.
Advantages MALDI-TOF:
·
Decrease the turnaround time significantly.
Processing times are comparable to those of fast biochemicals.
·
There is little sample needed, and sample
preparation is easy. It only takes one colony to produce spectra that are good
enough.
·
Low consumable costs and cost effectiveness.
·
Robust, automated reproducibility across labs
·
Wide range of application (all bacteria,
including fungi and anaerobes)
·
An open, flexible system that the user can grow.
Disadvantages:
·
Only if the spectral database has peptide mass
fingerprints of the type strains of particular genera, species, subspecies, or
strains can new isolates be identified.
·
No information about susceptibility is given.
·
Unhelpful for direct clinical specimen testing
(apart from urine).
·
Repeat analysis and additional processing
(extraction) are necessary for certain organisms.
·
Different studies have different acceptable
cutoff scores, and some closely related organisms are not distinguished.
5. IR MALDESI MS:
Since the development of
electrospray ionisation (ESI) and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation
(MALDI) sources—which are still the main techniques for ionising proteins—mass
spectrometry (MS) has emerged as the principal analytical tool utilised to
characterise both target and therapeutic proteins. When connected to a
time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometer, MALDI can analyse samples quickly—at a
rate of less than one second per sample—and generates mostly singly charged
ions, which make it possible to determine the molecular weight directly. [16]
LC-MS systems, which are
reliable and helpful for up to 384 sample analyses. However, faster and more
thorough MS analysis techniques are required for some activities where
1000–10,000 samples need to be analysed.
i.
Desorption electrospray ionization (DESI):
There have also recently
been reports of native MS with DESI. Protein MS imaging in tissue has also been
demonstrated using nano DESI. The first native-MS imaging of proteins using
nano DESI was reported by Cooper et al.
ii.
High Throughput Protein Analysis:
After IR-MALDESI-MS was
developed for protein standard measurement, its suitability for high throughput
protein analysis was examined.
iii.
BTK Phosphorylation and Compound Binding
Kinetics:
After IR-MALDESI-MS was
developed for protein standard measurement, its suitability for high throughput
protein analysis was examined.iv. Compound Modification to La Protein and
Top-down Analysis
The human La antigen (La
protein) is highly reactive to thiol-reactive compounds and can be used to
assess compound redox activity to identify false positives from biochemical
screens.[16]
iv.
High Throughput Sample Cleanup Coupled with
IR-MALDESI-MS:
Even at relatively high salt concentrations,
many salts and buffers exhibit concentration-dependent ion suppression effects.
Sample clean-up is necessary for certain applications due to relatively low
protein concentrations and high salt/buffer concentrations. Therefore, the
applicability of IR-MALDESI could be greatly increased by a quick, multiplexed
sample clean up step. To obtain high-quality spectra and facilitate data
interpretation, desalting had to be done. High throughput desalting of
individual protein samples can be accomplished using a variety of techniques, the
majority of which are marketed. Two plate-based strategies with IR-MALDESI-MS:
a)
Slit Plate:
Slit plate is a desalting plate that is sold
commercially and operates on a similar concept as TopTip. Different stationary
phase chromatographic materials can be inserted into micrometer-sized slits cut
at the bottom of wells.
MagneticBeads:
Another quick and adaptable
way to clean samples is with magnetic beads. To desalt or isolate and
concentrate a protein of interest, they can be coated with a variety of materials,
including protein A, Ni-NTA, and materials from reversed phase chromatography.
Following protein binding, unwanted species can be eliminated by performing
washes and using magnets to gather the beads. Numerous kinds of liquid handling
equipment can automate the sample cleanup process.In [16]
6. Method:
·
Instrumentation:
A description of the high
throughput IR-MALDESI-MS system was given. In short, samples were energised
using a 2970 nm laser, and the neutral laser plume was ionised using an
electrospray emitter that was oriented in relation to the MS inlet. The Q
Exactive HF-X mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher) was connected to the IR-MALDESI
source. Standard microtiter plate analysis was made possible by an extended
capillary equipped with a motorised stage and a specially designed cartridge
heater.
MS Conditions:
With the exception of the
top-down experiment, which employed a resolving power of 240, 000 (FWHM at m/z
= 200), intact protein analysis was conducted using a resolving power of 7, 500
(FWHM at m/z = 200). The ESI solvent, which was 80/20 methanol/water v/v with
0.1% formic acid, received a spray voltage of 4 kV. There was a 2 µL/min ESI
flow. The extended capillary's temperature was set to 120 °C, while the
capillary's temperature was fixed at 400 °C.
·
BTK Experiments:
The Bruceton's tyrosine
kinase (BTK) phosphorylation experiment was conducted in a buffer containing
0.5 mM MgCl2, 75 mM ammonium acetate, 5 mM HEPES pH 7.5, and 0.5 mM ATP. There
was 50 µM BTK used. The BTK binding experiment was conducted in 5 mM HEPES pH
7.5. The buffer was used to dilute 10 mM compound stock solutions to the
appropriate concentrations. To start the reaction, 10 µL of 35 µM BTK was first
added to each well, and then an equal volume of 2X compound solution was added.
The BTK compound solution received an equal volume of 1% formic acid in order
to denaturize BTK. Real-time IR-MALDESI readout was done straight from the
buffer.
Alarm MS:
In order to eliminate any
remaining dithiothreitol from the storage buffer, the first buffer to be
switched to PBS was La Protein. Before being subjected to IR-MALDESI-MS
analyses, 0.16 mg/mL La protein was desalted with C4 TopTip after being
incubated with 500 µM compounds for one hour.
·
Protein Desalting with BcMag Magnetic Beads:
Magnetic beads were kept at 4 °C after being
suspended in a 50 mg/mL solution of methanol and water (v/v). Plates were
filled with 10 µL/well of the stock mixture, and the storage solution was
removed using a magnetic carrier and a blue washer. To equilibrate the mag.
beads, 30 µL/well of equilibration buffer (0.5% trifluoroacetic acid, 95/5
water/acetonitrile v/v) was added and then removed. Before being added to the
working plate, 30 µL of the protein sample was combined with 10 µL of the
sampling binding buffer (2% trifluoroacetic acid, 95/5 water/acetonitrile v/v)
and allowed to sit for one minute. To release the protein, 30 µL of elution
buffer (50/50 acetonitrile/water) was added after three rounds of washing with
equilibration buffer. A PCR plate was used to elute the desalted samples for
IR-MALDESI-MS analysis.
7.
Current status of instrumentation in proteome analysis by mass spectrometry:
Despite the remarkable rate of advancement in
mass spectrometric instrumentation for protein analysis, no single instrument
currently satisfies all the needs for high-throughput proteome research within
a systems biology framework. There are, in fact, a staggering amount of
specialised instruments available. The number of mass spectrometers that are
currently on the market is increased when MALDI or ESI sources are used in
conjunction with the various mass analyzer types that were previously
discussed. Selecting the right technique for a given biological question
requires a thorough understanding of the functional principles of mass
spectrometers, as different models have different advantages and disadvantages.
In an effort to clarify the best courses of action, we present here a general
overview of the mass spectrometer types that are frequently employed in
proteome research.
8.
Applications:
Biochemistry: Strong/weak
ion exchange, size exclusion chromatography, affinity chromatography,
isotope-coded protein labelling (ICPL), SDS-PAGE, and two-dimensional gel
electrophoresis are among the proteomics techniques that use MALDI to quickly
identify proteins isolated through gel electrophoresis. The most widely used
analytical application of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometers is peptide mass
fingerprinting. Using high energy collision-induced dissociation or post-source
decay, MALDI TOF/TOF mass spectrometers can determine the amino acid sequence
of peptides (for additional uses, see mass spectrometry).
MALDI-TOF has been used to characterize post-translational modifications.
For example, it has been widely applied to study protein
methylation and demethylation. However, care must be taken when
studying post-translational modifications by MALDI-TOF. For example, it has
been reported that loss of sialic acid has been identified in papers
when dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHB) has been used as a matrix for MALDI
MS analysis of glycosylated peptides. Using sinapinic acid, 4-HCCA, and DHB as
matrices, S. Martin studied the loss of sialic acid in glycosylated peptides by
metastable decay in MALDI/TOF in linear mode and reflector mode [14]. A group
at Shimadzu Corporation derivatized the sialic acid by
an amidation reaction as a way to improve detection sensitivity and
also demonstrated that ionic liquid matrix reduces a loss of sialic acid during
MALDI/TOF MS analysis of sialylated oligosaccharides. It has been
determined that THAP, DHAP, and a combination of 2-aza-2-thiothymine and
phenylhydrazine are matrices that may be utilised to reduce sialic acid loss
during MALDI MS analysis of glycosylated peptides. It has been suggested that
using IR MALDI rather than UV MALDI can reduce the loss of some
post-translational modifications. In addition to proteins, lipids have also
been studied using MALDI-TOF. It has been used, for instance, to research the
catalytic processes of phospholipases. Apart from lipids, MALDI-TOF has also
been used to characterise oligonucleotides. For instance, after oligonucleotide
synthesis, a combination of spermine and 5-methoxy salicylic acid can be
utilised as a matrix for oligonucleotide analysis in MALDI mass spectrometry in
molecular biology.
Organic chemistry: Some synthetic macromolecules have
molecular weights that extend into the thousands or tens of thousands, where
most ionisation techniques have trouble producing molecular ions. Examples of
these macromolecules are catenanes and rotaxanes, dendrimers and hyperbranched
polymers, and other assemblies. Chemists can quickly examine and validate the outcomes
of these syntheses using the straightforward and quick analytical technique
MALDI.
Polymers: The molar mass distribution in polymer
can be found using MALDI chemistry. Using MALDI to characterise polymers with
polydispersity greater than 1.2 is challenging because of the
discrimination of signal intensity against oligomers of higher mass. AgTFA or
dithranol forms an excellent matrix for polymers. AgTFA must be added after the
sample has been combined with dithranol; otherwise, the sample will precipitate
out of the solution.
Microbiology: A common application of MALDI-TOF spectra
is the identification of microorganisms like fungi and bacteria. A section of
the relevant microbe's colony is deposited onto the sample target and covered
in matrix. In a process known as biotyping, the mass spectra of expressed
proteins are generated, examined by specialised software, and contrasted with
profiles that have been stored to determine the species. It is now a standard
technique for species identification in clinical microbiological laboratories
and has advantages over other immunological or biochemical techniques. With an
emphasis on influenza viruses specifically, the advantages of high-resolution
MALDI-MS carried out on a Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass
spectrometry, or FT-MS, have been shown for typing and subtyping viruses
through single ion detection known as prototyping [15]. Its ability to quickly
and accurately identify a wide range of microorganisms at a low cost straight
from the selective medium used to isolate them is one of its main advantages
over other microbiological identification techniques. Turnaround times are much
faster when there is no need to purify the suspect or "presumptive"
colony. For instance, it has been shown that bacteria can be directly detected
from blood cultures using MALDI-TOF. The ability to forecast a bacteria's
susceptibility to antibiotics is an additional benefit. One mass spectral peak
can forecast Staphylococcus aureus's methicillin resistance. Acinetobacter
baumannii and pneumonia are among the Enterobacteriaceae resistant to
carbapenems, and MALDI is also capable of detecting their carbapenemase.
The majority of antibiotic resistance-mediating proteins, however, are larger
than the 2000–20,000 Da range of MALDI-TOF for protein peak interpretation. In
rare instances, such as the 2011 NIH Klebsiella pneumonia carbapenemase (KPC)
outbreak, a correlation between a peak and a resistance-conferring protein can
be established.
Parasitology: Plasmodium, Leishmania, and
trypanosomatids are just a few of the parasites that can be found and
identified using MALDI-TOF spectra. Apart from these unicellular parasites,
parasitic insects like lice or cercariae—the free-swimming stage of
trematodes—can also be identified using MALDI/TOF.
Medicine: When diagnosing illnesses, MALDI-TOF
spectra are frequently used in conjunction with other analysis and spectroscopy
methods. Because it can quickly identify proteins and changes to proteins
without the expense or processing power of sequencing or the expertise or time required
to solve a crystal structure in X-ray crystallography, MALDI/TOF is a
diagnostic tool with a lot of potential.
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), a terrible
illness that affects the intestines of premature infants, is one instance of
this. Since the symptoms of NEC and sepsis are so similar, many infants pass
away while they are being diagnosed and treated. To identify the bacteria found
in the faeces of infants who tested positive for NEC, MALDI/TOF was utilised.
This study did not address the disease's mechanism, instead concentrating on
characterising the faecal microbiota linked to non-epidermal cystic acne. It is
hoped that a similar method could be applied as a fast, non-sequencing
diagnostic tool. The field of cancer is one more instance of MALDI/TOF's
diagnostic efficacy. One of the deadliest and most challenging cancers to
diagnose is still pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic cancer has long been thought to
be caused in part by impaired cellular signalling brought on by mutations in
membrane proteins. A membrane protein linked to pancreatic cancer has been
found using MALDI/TOF, which at one point may even be used as an early
detection method [15]. In addition to dictating diagnosis, MALDI/TOF may also
be used for treatment planning. One technique for assessing bacterial drug
resistance, particularly to β-lactams (a class of antibiotics), is MALDI/TOF.
Drug resistance to common antibiotics is indicated by the presence of
carbapenemases, which is detected by the MALDI/TOF. This has the potential to
be a three-hour turnaround time for determining whether a bacterium is
drug-resistant. This method may assist doctors in determining whether to start
off with more potent antibiotic prescriptions.
Detection of
protein complexes: Investigations
of large protein complexes using MALDI-MS have been reported, following
preliminary findings that some peptide-peptide complexes could survive MALDI
deposition and ionisation.
CONCLUSION:
In
a systems biology setting, mass spectrometry-based protein identification is
currently the most potent tool available for proteome research. The range and
continuous advancement of mass spectrometric methods ensures continued
enhancements in the efficiency of protein identification and expands the
application of proteomics analyses in general. Since mass spectrometric protein
analysis is currently in such a dynamic state, it is challenging to create the
long-needed standards for widely recognised practises. As such, a direct
comparison between disparate instruments lacks significance. Developing
effective methods for protein detection or quantification requires a basic
understanding of the various mass spectrometric designs. Still, it is currently
unclear which design will gain widespread acceptance. With its latest
improvements, FT-ICR-MS is now the most promising MS platform available;
however, it is important to monitor other developments as well. Among them are
the new ion trap designs, such as the linear ion trap and Orbitrap, which now
form the basis of a new creation of extremely sensitive tandem mass
spectrometers with high power. These mass analyzers could offer an affordable
and space-saving substitute for FT-ICR-MS systems. Thus, there is a greater
chance that various MS technologies will continue to coexist.
In proteome analysis, the single mass analyzer
design which cannot perform "real" tandem MS—is in danger of becoming
extinct. The requirement for higher sample throughput in conjunction with
high-performance MS may be the most difficult of all. When combined with
isotope tagging techniques, automated multi-dimensional peptide separation
techniques should offer mass spectrometry a high throughput platform with
enough analytical depth for proteome analyses.
Increased
automation of mass spectrometric analysis, proteome interpretation, and sample
handling is producing a deluge of quantitative and qualitative proteome data,
as has already occurred in genomics. It is increasingly clear that the primary
impediment to mass spectrometric protein identification is the high-performance
computation of recorded MS data. [16]
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Authors
are thankful to Principal and Management J.I.I.U' S Ali Allana College of
Pharmacy Akkalkuwa, Dist. Nandurbar for providing moral support and necessary
facilities for completion of this work.
REFERENCES:
1.
https://www.creative-proteomics.com/resource/the-principle-characteristics-and-application-of-peptide-mass-fingerprinting.htm
[last visit 23-03-2023/15:31]
2.
(PDF)
Protein identification using mass spectrometry: A method overview
(researchgate.net)3. B. Spengler, P.
Chaurand, and F. Luetzenkirchen "Using Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption
Ionisation (MALDI) and MALDI-Post-Source Decay Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry
to Identify Peptides and Proteins" Copyright 1999 by the American Society
for Mass Spectrometry. Published by Science Inc. Elsevier. on October 29, 1998,
accepted.
3.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matrix-assisted_laser_desorption/ionization
4.
20 Douglas A. Skoog, Stanley R.
Crouch, and F. James Holler, "Principles of Instrumental Analysis,"
Seventh Edition,2016-page no.509,510.
5.
Judith Webster and David Oxley” Protein
Identification by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry” DOI
10.1007/978-1-61779-349-3_15, © Springer Science Business Media, LLC 2012
6.
Šebela, M. Biomolecular Profiling by
MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry in Food and Beverage Analyses. Int. J. Mol. Sci.
2022, 23, 13631. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijms232113631 Published: 7 November
2022
7.
https://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms.Int.J.Mol.Sci.2022,23,
13631.https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113631
8.
Daniel J Ryan1,2, Jeffrey M
Spraggins1,2,3, and Richard M Caprioli1,2,3,4” Protein identification
strategies in MALDI imaging mass spectrometry: a brief review Current Opinion
in Chemical Biology 2019, 48:64–72 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2018.10.023
9.
Donna M. Wolk, Andrew E. Clark, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cll.2018.05.008
0272-2712/18/ª 2018
10.
Emine B. Yalcin and Suzanne M. de la
Monte” Review of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Imaging Mass
Spectrometry for Lipid Biochemical Histopathology” Journal of Histochemistry
& Cytochemistry 1–10 © The Author(s) 2015. June 18, 2015.
11.
Sven Schuchardt1 and Albert Sickmann”
Protein identification using mass spectrometry: A method overview” DOI:
10.1007/978-3-7643-7439-6_7 · Source: PubMed February 2007.
12.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6396740.
13.
Fan Pu, Scott A. Ugrin, Andrew J.
Radosevich, David Chang-Yen, James W. Sawicki, Nari N. Talaty, Nathaniel L.
Elsen and Jon D. Williams” High
Throughput Intact Protein Analysis Using Infrared Matrix-Assisted Laser
Desorption Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry” doi:
https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.08.467755; December 18, 2021