Advancements in Liquisolid Compacts Technology Formulation and
Characterization
Mohammad Faizan, Ismail Moazzam.
Department of Pharmaceutics, Maulana
Azad Educational Trust’s Y.B. Chavan College of Pharmacy, Aurangabad 431003,
Maharashtra.
*Correspondence: md.faizan189070@gmail.com
|
Article Information
|
|
Abstract
|
|
Review Article
Received: 18/07/2024
Accepted: 2407/2024
Published:26/07/2024
Keywords
Carrier coating
material,
Liquisolid compacts, solubility enhancement liquisolid,
Loading factor.
|
|
The liquisolid
approach shows promise in addressing bioavailability and solubility issues in
medications. The use of organic solvents that are soluble in water, such as
glycerine, propylene glycol, or polyethylene glycols, improves wettability
and guarantees the molecular dispersion of medications that are insoluble in
water. Aerosil-200 is a coating substance and microcrystalline cellulose is a
common carrier. Liquisolid compacts have more surface area, better
wettability, water solubility, and improved drug release. Using this method,
medication suspensions or solutions are turned into dry, pliable, and
compressible powders. Evaluations of flow behaviour, wettability,
hydrophilicity, solubility, drug content, and analytical methods such as XRD,
FT-IR, and DSC are all included in the characterization process. Liquisolid
systems present a new and effective option to formulate pharmaceuticals that
are both water-soluble and water-insoluble, opening up a route for better
medication performance, sustained drug delivery, and greater solubility.
|
INTRODUCTION
One of the technical challenges in
developing an appropriate dosage form for effective drug administration is the
solubility of many active pharmacological components. In the gastrointestinal
tract, the majority of hydrophobic medications classified as sparingly soluble,
barely soluble, and very slightly soluble dissolve extremely poorly, resulting
in uneven and insufficient absorption. [[i]]
Roughly 60% of synthetic chemical entities and 40% of recently created
medications are said to have solubility problems. Thus, many pharmaceutical
scientists are interested in finding ways to increase the solubility and
dissolution of these weakly water-soluble medications as well as their bio
availabilities. These medications classified as Biopharmaceutical Classification
System Class II (BCS II) are frequently restricted in their bioavailability due
to their gastrointestinal tract solubility and dissolution rate. [[ii]]
Current studies have
highlighted the efficaciousness of the liquisolid compact approach in improving
the solubility of pharmaceuticals with low water solubility and in creating
solid dosage forms with instant release. The novel technique known as
"liquisolid compacts" is thought to be a viable tactic for reaching
this objective. [[iii]] This method has the potential to enhance the solubility of drugs
and create solid dosage forms with instant release properties.[[iv]] The primary issue with the
formulation development of novel chemical entities and the production of
generic drugs is low water solubility.[[v]] The term "liquisolid systems," as used by Spireas,
refers to the process of physically blending a liquid with certain excipients
known as the carrier and coating ingredients to create a free-flowing, easily
compressible, and ostensibly dry powder.[[vi]]In liquisolid systems, a medicine is sorption-deposited into a
porous carrier encircled by small coated particles. This process produces a
powder that is free-flowing, compactable, and has a dry appearance. This novel
method allows for better breakdown of poorly soluble medications and allows for
controlled drug release. [[vii]]
Drugs can be carried in
a liquid system and distributed throughout the finished product by using
non-volatile solvents to prevent liquid evaporation during drug
solution/suspension manufacturing. [[viii]]Excipients with strong
adsorption qualities and porous surfaces, such as celluloses, lactose, starch,
and avicel, fuji Calin, neusilin are used as carriers. Coating materials
include silica powders like Aerosil and Cab-o-sil. [[ix]] In liquisolid
technology, mesoporous silica has drawn interest for its unique surface
features, non-toxicity, and inert qualities, which help improve the solubility
of poorly soluble medications. As a molecular sieve, mesoporous silica's high
porosity and vast internal surface area allow it to adsorb a sizable amount of
liquid. This mesopore network improves bioavailability by increasing dissolving
rates. [[x]] Excipients such as
disintegrants and super disintegrants are frequently added to solid dosage
forms with improved drug release to encourage the formulation's disintegration
into tiny fragments in the gastrointestinal fluids. [[xi]]Key benefits of the liquisolid
compact technology are low cost, easy processing, and great industrial output
potential. It turns out that this is one of the best strategies to improve a
drug's bioavailability, dissolution, and solubility. [[xii]] This approach has promise for
enhancing the photostability of susceptible medications in solid dose forms. In
this case, the photoprotective properties of particular excipients (coat and
carrier) provide an alternative to traditional tablet coatings. [[xiii]]
Using standard procedures to convert high-dose medications
into liquisolid tablets less than 1g is impractical. [[xiv]]
For compatibility tests, pre-`formulation experiments, such as DSC and
FTIR, are conducted on pre-flowing powder stands. Many aspects, including angle
of repose, flow properties, solubility studies, and liquid load retention
potential, are investigated to optimize water solubility and medication
release. With continued research into its possible uses
in the pharmaceutical sector, liquidsolid technology appears to be one of the
most promising approaches for fostering drug degradation and maintaining drug
release.[12]
ADVANTAGES OF LIQUISOLID
SYSTEMS
Ø
Compared to soft
gelatin capsules, liquisolid systems are less expensive formulations.
Ø
Their production is
comparable to that of regular tablets.
Ø
By employing the
right formulation ingredients, drug release can be adjusted. [[xv]]
Ø
Industrial
production's capacity. [[xvi]]
Ø
The number of solid
drugs that are water-insoluble can be formed into liquisolid systems;
Ø
The medication has
higher bioavailability than traditional tablets.
Ø
The volume of the
dissolving media has no bearing on the drug's dissolution from liquisolid
compact. [[xvii]]
Ø Even when a medicine is shaped like a tablet
or capsule, it retains its solubilized liquid form, improving drug dissolving
and wetting properties.
Ø
The drug is retained
in a solubilized liquid state even if it is in a tablet or capsule shape, which
increases the drug's wetting qualities and improves drug dissolution.
Ø
Drug release can be
adjusted with the right formulation elements. [[xviii]]
LIMITATIONS
Ø This method is not suitable for the formulation of
high-dosage insoluble drugs.
Ø Adding more carrier to create a free-flowing powder makes
the tablet heavier than one gram, making it difficult to swallow.
Ø Acceptable compression properties might not be reached
because the liquid drug might be forced out of the liquisolid tablet during
compression, resulting in tablets with an uneven hardness.[18]
Ø It might not be possible to introduce this technology on
an industrial scale and find a solution to the issue of combining small amounts
of viscous liquid solutions onto huge amounts of carrier material.
Ø The solvent nature of hydrotropy is said to be
pH-independent, very selective, and does not require emulsification, making it
preferable to other solubilization techniques including miscibility, micellar
solubilization, co-solvency, and salting in. [[xix]]
Ø The medicine must be highly soluble in non-volatile
liquid media. [[xx]]
Ø High dosage, water-insoluble, lipophilic medicines are
not well suited for formulation using the liquid-solid technique.
Ø It does not call for the creation of an emulsion system,
the use of organic solvents, or the chemical modification of hydrophobic
medications.[10]
COMPONENT OF LIQUISOLID COMPACTS
1) Drug
They might not even dissolve in water. The
medications used in liquisolid systems should be water insoluble, weakly
soluble, or low dose. It needs to be classified as BCS classes II. [[xxi]]
2)
Liquid Vehicle
Non-volatile organic solvents that are
water soluble, inert, and suitable for oral consumption should be used as the
liquid vehicle in liquisolid systems. Propylene glycol, glycerine, polysorbate
20 and 80, PEG 200 and 400, and so on are a few examples of these solvents. The
drug's solubility in non-volatile solvent has a major effect on tablet weight
and dissolving profile. Because the drug dissolves more readily in the solvent,
less carrier and coating material are needed to produce tablets with lower
weights. [[xxii]]
Table 1: Representing Various
Reported Non-volatile solvent
|
Sr.
No
|
Non-volatile
Liquid vehicle
|
Chemical
Formula
|
HLB
Value
|
|
1
|
PG
|
1,2 propanol
|
2.5
|
|
2
|
PEG-200 monostearate
|
Poly
(oxy-1,2 ethanediol) alpha hydro omega hydroxy
|
8
|
|
3
|
PEG-400 monostearate
|
Poly (oxy-1,2 ethanediol) alpha hydro omega hydroxy
|
11.5
|
|
4
|
Polysorbate
80 or Tween 80
|
Polyoxy
ethylene 20 sorbitan monooleate
|
15
|
|
5
|
Transcutol-Hp
|
Diethylene glycol monoethyl
ether
|
4
|
|
6
|
Cremophor EL
|
polyoxyl 35 hydrogenated castor oil HLB
|
12–14
|
3) Carrier
Material
Carriers with strong liquid absorption capacities and porous
surfaces are essential for successful liquisolid compositions. The type of
coating material, the viscosity, polarity, and chemical structure of the liquid
vehicle, as well as its carrier specific surface area (SSA), are factors that
affect liquid absorption. The enhanced flowability, compressibility, and
dissolving profiles of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC).[2]
The quantity of wettability and surface exposure of the drug
particles with the dissolving media is ultimately determined by the powder's
specific surface area (SSA). Choosing a carrier with a high Specific Surface
area is therefore crucial. Table 1 lists the surface areas of several carriers
that were tested using the BET Surface Area technique, according to Nokhodchi
et al. The unusually high SSA of Neusilin® US2 was shown to improve the powder
blend's liquid load factor by a factor of 7. Because Microcrystalline Cellulose
and other similar carriers have a low liquid absorption capacity, Neusilin® US2
therefore holds great promise for both achieving a competent dissolution
profile and high dose integration for Liquisolid technology.
Table 2: Surface areas of
various powders used as carriers in Liquisolid System [[xxiii]]
|
Carrier
|
Surface
Area (m2/g)
|
|
Lactose
|
0.35 m2/g
|
|
Sorbitol
|
0.37 m2/g
|
|
Avicel®
PH200 (Microcrystalline Cellulose)
|
1 m2/g
|
|
Fuji
Calin® (Synthetic Dibasic Calcium Phosphate Anhydrous)
|
32
m2/g
|
|
Neusilin
|
339 m2/g
|
4) Coating Material:
Fine, incredibly adsorptive coating components—which are
typically in the form of powder are used in liquidsolid compositions. Notable
examples include calcium silicate, Aerosil® 200, Neusilin®, and magnesium
alumino-metasilicates. These ingredients are essential to the liquisolid
formulation process because they coat wet carrier particles to create a dry,
non-adherent, free-flowing powder. They achieve this by drawing excess liquid
out of the mixture and absorbing it using adsorbents. One of the main benefits
of using Neusilin® as a coating material is that it can reduce tablet weight
and boost liquid adsorption capacity greatly when compared to alternatives like
Aerosil® 200.[4]
Table 3: Representing the
various Reported Coating Material
|
Sr.
No
|
Coating
Material
|
Chemical
Name
|
Specific
Surface Area(m2/g)
|
Properties
|
|
1
|
Aerosil
|
Hydrophilic Fumed Silica
|
200
|
Good adsorption capacity and enhance flowability
|
|
2
|
Cab-O-Sil M5-P
|
Untreated fumed silica
|
220
|
Small particle size, greater surface area and high purity.
|
|
3
|
Syloid
|
Amorphous silicon
|
312
|
Low pore volume and high internal surface area.
|
|
4
|
Neusilin
|
Amorphous aluminomagnesium metasilicate
|
44-250
|
Larger surface area and greater
adsorption capacity.
|
5) Super Disintegrants
These are
employed to disintegrate the compacts into smaller fragments. Super
Disintegrates: Pulmogel, Sodium Starch Glycolate (SSG), Explotab,
Pre-gelatinized starch, Crossprovidone, and Sodium Croscarmellose etc. [18]
Table 4:
Components generally involved in a liquisolid formulation. [[xxiv]]
|
Excipients Type
|
Characteristics
|
Examples
|
|
Non-Volatile Solvent
|
Inert
water-miscible, suitable with medication candidate.
|
glycerine,
propylene glycol, polysorbate, tween 20, tween 80, PEG 200,400,600, etc.
|
|
Coating Material
|
incredibly fine and highly adsorptive particles
with a positive flow-aiding impact.
|
Colloidal
silicon dioxide
(e.g.
Aerosil/Cab-O-Sil) Neusilin Calcium Silicate
etc.
|
|
Carrier Material
|
Porous, has a high
specific surface area, good flowability, strong adsorption capacity, and good
compressibility.
|
Dibasic calcium phosphate
anhydrous, magnesium aluminium silicate, Avicel etc.
|
PREPARATION OF LIQUISOLID
COMPACTS
Drug and non-volatile solvent
quantities are precisely weighed into a 20- ml glass beaker, and the solvent is
heated to dissolve the drug in it. The hot medicament that is produced is used
to determine how much carrier and coating material is needed. According to Spiraea’s
et al., there are three processes in the mixing.
First Stage: To disperse liquid medication equally throughout
the powder, the system is blended for about a minute at a pace of one
revolution per second.
Second Stage: In order to allow the medication
solution to seep into the interior of the powder particles, the liquid/powder
admixture is uniformly distributed out over the surfaces of a mortar and
allowed to stand for about five minutes.
Third Stage: Using an aluminium spatula, the powder is
removed from the mortar surfaces, and it is then mixed with sodium starch
glycolate for an additional 30 seconds, just like in the first step. This makes
it possible to compress the final liquisolid formulation. [[xxv]]
Subsequently, each batch was mixed for 30 seconds after the
addition of super disintegrant, and then for another two minutes after the
addition of lubricant. Using an appropriate punch in a rotating tablet
compression machine, the final LS powder formulation was compressed into LSCs. [[xxvi]]
MECHANISMS OF ENHANCED DRUG RELEASE FROM LIQUISOLID
SYSTEMS
Liquisolid systems have given rise to several hypothesized
methods of increased drug release Three primary processes have been proposed.
[[xxvii]]
1.
Increased drug surface Area:
The drug is still
present in powdered form even after the chosen non-volatile solvent totally
dissolves the drug particles. Compared to immediately compressible tablets,
liquisolid compacts have a larger surface area. The amount of medicine in
contact with the dissolving liquid increases with an increase in surface area.
If the formulation of the liquisolid compacts has a greater proportion of
undissolved drug, drug release will be decreased. In contrast, drug release
would increase with an increase in the amount of molecularly distributed drug. [[xxviii]]
Figure 1. Outline of Liquisolid preparation [[xxix]]
2. Increased aqueous solubility of the Drug:
In a liquisolid compact,
the comparatively modest volume of liquid vehicle is insufficient to raise the
drug's total solubility in the aqueous dissolution medium. The amount of liquid
vehicle that diffuses out of a single liquisolid particle along with the drug
molecules, however, may be sufficient to increase the aqueous solubility of the
drug if the liquid vehicle functions as a cosolvent at the solid/liquid
interface between the release medium and an individual liquisolid primary
particle. [[xxx]]
3.Improved
wetting properties:
Wetting of the liquisolid main particles is enhanced by the
liquid vehicle's ability to function as a surface-active agent or have a low
surface tension. The measurement of contact angles and water rising times has
proven the wettability of these systems. It is plausible that the quantity of
liquid vehicle diffusing out of a single liquisolid particle in this context.
[[xxxi]]

Fig 2: Wetting property of liquisolid system
FORMULATIONS OF LIQUISOLID COMPACTS
1. In Antihypertensive Class:
|
Sr
NO
|
DRUG
|
BCS
CLASS
|
NON-VOLATILE
SOLVENT
|
CARRIER
MATERIAL
|
COATING
MATERIL
|
SUPER
DISINTIGRANT
|
REFERENCE
|
|
1
|
Candesartan
|
II
|
PEG -400, PG
|
Avicel PH
102
|
Aerosil-200
|
Cross Carmellose
Sodium (CCS)
|
[[xxxii]]
|
|
2
|
Olmesartan
Medoxomil
|
II
|
Acrysol EL 135, Plurololeique, Lauroglycol Acconon C-80, Captax 200,
Captax 355, PG, PEG 200, PEG400, Capmul MCM& Castor oil.
|
Avicel PH
102
|
Aerosol-
200
|
Cross Carmellose
Sodium
|
[[xxxiii]]
|
|
3
|
Amlodipine
besylate and
Valsartan
|
II
|
Propylene glycol, PEG 400, PEG 600,
0.1N HCl, Phosphate buffer pH 6.8 and
Distilled water.
|
MCC
|
Aerosil-
200
|
Cross povidone
|
[[xxxiv]]
|
|
4
|
Telmisartan
|
II
|
Transcutol HP, propylene glycol, PEG
200, PEG 600, Tween
20, and Tween 80
|
Avicel PH
102
|
Aerosil-
200
|
CCS
|
[[xxxv]]
|
|
5
|
Valsartan
|
II
|
Propylene glycol
|
Avicel PH
102
|
Aerosil-
200
|
CCS
|
[[xxxvi]]
|
|
6
|
Eprosartan mesylate
|
II
|
PEG 400
|
MCC
|
Aerosil-
200
|
Sodium starch glycolate
|
[[xxxvii]]
|
|
7
|
Nifedipine
|
II
|
PEG 400, Tween 80
|
Avicel PH
102
|
silica gel
powder
|
--
|
[[xxxviii]]
|
|
8
|
Eplerenone
|
II
|
PEG-400
|
Avicel PH 101
|
|
|
[[xxxix]]
|
2. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
|
Sr
NO
|
DRUG
|
BCS
CLASS
|
NON-VOLATILE SOLVENT
|
CARRIER
MATERIAL
|
COATING
MATERIL
|
SUPER
DISINTIGRANT
|
REFERENCE
|
|
9
|
Naproxen
|
II
|
Cremophor EL
|
MCC
|
Colloidal
silica
|
maize starch
|
[[xl]]
|
|
10
|
Acelofenac
|
II
|
Propylene glycol, PEG 400 and Tween 80.
|
MCC
|
Aerosil
|
Cross povidone, SSG&CCS
|
[[xli]]
|
|
11
|
Nimesulide
|
II
|
PEG 400
|
MCC,
HPMC-E15,
Soluble starch
|
nm- sized
silica gel
|
Sodium Starch
Glycolate
(SSG)
|
[[xlii]]
|
|
12
|
Piroxicam
|
II
|
Tween 80
|
MCC
|
Silica
|
sodium starch glycolate
|
[[xliii]]
|
|
13
|
Ketoprofen
|
II
|
PEG 400
|
MCC
|
Aerosil PH 200
|
CCS
|
[[xliv]]
|
|
14
|
Ibuprofen
|
II
|
propylene
glycol, polyethylene glycol (PEG) 200, cremophor RH 40, tween 80,
|
MCC
|
Aerosil
200
|
sodium starch
glycolate, cross povidone
|
[[xlv]]
|
|
15
|
Celecoxib
|
II
|
PEG 200
|
Avicel
|
Aerosil
PH 101
|
sodium starch
glycolate
|
[[xlvi]]
|
EVALUATION OF
LIQUISOLID SYSTEMS
Precompression
Studies Of Prepared Liquisolid Powders
1. Angle of repose (θ):
A funnel approach was used to
calculate the angle of repose. A vertically adjustable funnel was used to pour
the mixture through until the desired maximum cone height (h) was reached. The
angle of repose was computed and the heap's radius (r) measured. It is the
angle formed by the pile's heap and base. [[xlvii]]

Where,
θ=Angle of
repose,
h=H eight of heap and,
r=Radius of pile.
2. Compressibility
index:
Compressibility
is the most straightforward method of measuring powder free flow. The
compressibility index provides information on how easily a material may be made
to flow.

Where,
Vb=Bulk volume
Vt=Tapped volume.
3. Hausner’s Ratio [[xlviii]]
A crucial factor in figuring out the flow characteristics
of powder and granules is Hausner's ratio. This can be computed using the
formula that follows.

Differential
scanning calorimetry (DSC):
Differential scanning calorimetric
analysis (DSC Q20 TA instrument) is used to examine the physicochemical
compatibilities and polymorphic alterations of the drug and excipients. For
DSC, two milligrams of pure drug samples and liquid-solid compacts are precisely
weighed and placed in aluminium pans. The empty pan is sealed and used as a
reference. Indium serves as the reference for calibration of the device. At a
scanning rate of 140 degrees Celsius per minute, the sample's thermal behaviour
is examined over a temperature range of 0 to 200 degrees Celsius. [[xlix]]
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)
Investigations of the interactions between
drugs and excipients were done using FTIR. Using an IR spectrophotometer
(Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), the sustained release liquisolid formulation, carrier
material, coating material, physical mixture, and active medication were
examined. The KBr disc approach was used, and it took three minutes to scan.
The 400 cm-1 and 4000 cm-1 scanning ranges were used to record the spectra. [[l]]
The absence of extra peaks in the formulation and the presence of typical peaks
indicate the absence of chemical interactions.
Powder X-Ray Diffraction (PXRD)
A popular non-destructive analytical technique for
determining a powder's crystalline behaviour in a three-dimensional structure
is this one. Additionally, the discovery of new medications, stability testing,
and final product quality control frequently employ this analytical technique.
When developing a liquisolid compact formulation, PXRD is used to evaluate the
changes in the physicochemical properties of the drug and excipients. [[li]]
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
Field emission gun
scanning electron microscopy (FEG-SEM) was used to study the surface and shape
characterization of liquisolid powder. Using carbon double-sided tape, the
sample was scattered and then attached to aluminium stubs. A high vacuum
evaporator was used to sputter coat liquid-solid powder with platinum in an
argon atmosphere.
After that, the stump
was scanned in a nitrogen atmosphere for 20 minutes within a vacuum chamber. employed
a 5 Kv accelerating voltage (LABS) for topological research and
characterization. [[lii]]
Contact
Angle Measurement
The imaging approach is
utilized to measure the contact angle of liquisolid tablets in order to analyse
their wettability. The most widely used technique, known as the "imaging
method," measures the contact angle for a liquid drop that is lying on a
level surface of solid material directly. A drop of a drug-saturated solution
in dissolving media is applied to the tablet's surface. [[liii]]
The diameter and height of the sphere drop on the tablet are measured in order
to compute the contact angles. The contact angle measurement using imaging
method is shown in Figure 3.
Fig:3 Schematic Representation of Contact Angle Measurement Using
Imagin Method
Calculation of Loading Factor:
To
determine a powder's flowability and compressibility, the loading factor is
computed using the angle of slide measurement for various carriers and coating
materials. Different carriers were used to calculate loading factors utilizing
a range of After obtaining the drug loading parameters, the amount of coating
and carrier ingredients in each formulation was determined by utilizing the
flowing formula.



The
findings demonstrated that less carrier and coating material was required to
create flowable powder at increasing solvent viscosities.
Table 5: Reported
Loading Factor Various Excipients powder with liquid vehicle.
|
Powder Excipient
or System
|
Φ - Value
|
Ψ – Value
|
|
Propylene glycol
|
PEG -400
|
Propylene glycol
|
PEG -400
|
|
Avicel pH-101
|
0.16
|
0.005
|
0.224
|
0.242
|
|
Avicel PH-200
|
0.26
|
0.02
|
0.209
|
0.232
|
|
Cab-O-Sil m5(silica) with Avicel pH-102
|
3.31
|
3.26
|
0.560
|
0.653
|
|
Cab-O-Sil m5(silica) with Avicel pH-101
|
2.570
|
2.44
|
0.721
|
0.717
|
In Vivo Evaluation of Liquisolid Tablets
Two dosage forms, each carrying the equivalent of 20 mg of
commercial famotidine tablets, were used in the study. Liquisolid tablet F14. The 0.571 g
liquisolid tablets were made up of 0.458 g Avicel PH 102 and 0.009 g Aerosil
200, which were made with 20% famotidine in PG, or 20 mg of famotidine. The
dosage forms were given according to a randomized, cross-over, single-dose
design. The volunteers were split up into two groups of three each: Phase I: F1
was given to the first group and F14 LST was given to the second. Phase II: F1
was given to the second group and F14 LST was given to the first. Between the
two phases, there was a 14-day washout interval. After an overnight fast, the
medication was given in the experimental setup. The individuals received 400 millilitres
of water at 7:00 am on the day of treatment, then 300 millilitres of water
along with the medication at 8:00 am. Three hours after the dosage form was
administered, a regular breakfast was had. Before the dose form was
administered, as well as 20, 40 minutes, and 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 hours
after the medicine was administered, heparinized venous blood samples were
drawn into glass tubes. After gathering all of the samples, the serum was
quickly separated from the blood cells using centrifugation at 3000 rpm for ten
minutes. It was then frozen at 20 C until analysis. [[liv]]
These contradictory findings regarding liquidsolid formulations
demonstrated the need for additional in vivo evidence to support the liquisolid
tablets' superiority. However, in general, the majority of research
demonstrated that liquisolid formulations performed better than their
commercial counterparts. [[lv]]
In Vitro Drug Release
The in-vitro drug release analysis of the tablets was carried
out using USP type II equipment paddle at 37°C ± 0.5°C using 0.1 N HCL (900 ml)
as a dissolution medium and 50 rpm. The dissolution test was utilized to
compare liquid-solid compact tablets and marketed tablets. 10 ml samples were
taken out and replaced with brand-new dissolving medium at the scheduled
intervals. Samples that had been withheld were filtered using a 0.45-m membrane
filter.[48] A calibration curve was used to generate an equation
that was used to compute the cumulative percentage of medication release.[45]
Stability of Liquisolid systems with
Enhanced drug Release:
The effects of storage on the crushing strength and release
profile of liquisolid compacts were examined in order to gather data on the
stability of liquisolid systems. Studies on the stability of liquisolid systems
containing polythiazide (40 °C/42 and 75% R.H., 12 weeks), hydrocortisone
(ambient conditions, 10 months) [1], carbamazepine (25 °C/75 % R.H., 6 months),
indomethacin (25 °C/75 % R.H., 12 months), piroxicam (25 °C/75 % R.H., 6 and 9
months, respectively), or naproxen (20 °C/76 % R.H., 4 weeks) demonstrated that
neither the hardness nor the release profiles of liquisolid compacts were
affected by storage under various conditions. This suggests that the technology
is a promising method for increasing the release rate without compromising
physical stability. [[lvi]]
APPLICATIONS
Ø One effective method for increasing the bioavailability
of medications that are water insoluble is the use of liquidsolid compact technology.
Liquisolid compacts have been developed from a number of water-insoluble
medications that dissolve in various non-volatile solvents.
Ø A number of medications have been effectively added to
liquisolid compacts, according to literature. [[lvii]]
Ø Long-term This approach has been used to obtain the
release of medications that are water soluble, such as propranolol
hydrochloride.
Ø Liquisolid formulations have rapid release rates.
Ø Liquisolid
technique as a promising tool to improve drug
photostability in solid dosage forms.
Ø making them
effective for usage with liquid lipophilic or water-insoluble solid medicines. [[lviii]]
Ø
The use of the
liquidsolid method can help reduce the impact of pH variations on medication
release. The ionization constant (pKa)
of the chemical and the pH of the surrounding environment determine how soluble
weak acids and bases are. The pH of gastrointestinal fluids therefore has a
significant impact on the solubility and absorption of many medications.This
results in a considerable level of diversity both within and between medication
bioavailability and therapeutic effects.[[lix]][[lx]]
CONCLUSION
This liquisolid technology can be used to create both liquid lipophilic
medications and solid pharmaceuticals that are insoluble in water. By choosing
the right solvent and carrier, the Liquisolid technique can improve the
absorption and dissolution rate of a drug that is poorly soluble, insoluble, or
lipophilic. It can also be used to formulate drugs for immediate release,
sustained release, or controlled release. Because liquid drugs are intended to
be included in powdered form in Liquisolid formulations, their drug delivery
mechanisms are comparable to those of liquid-containing soft gelatin capsule
preparations. Liquisolid formulations exhibit improved solubility, dissolution,
compressibility, flowability, and absorption. Additionally, the method is used
to create sustained release systems using hydrophobic carriers rather than
hydrophilic ones. Liquid-solid compacts with various formulations show that
they have the finest instruments for enhancing medication dispersion.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Mr. Farhat Jamal (Chairman Maulana Azad
Educational Trust) for his motivation and facilities for conducting research
work.
REFERENCES:
1.
Manogar PG,
Hari BV, Devi DR. Emerging liquisolid compact technology for solubility enhancement of BCS class-II drug. Journal
of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2011 Dec 1;3(12):1604.
2.
Lu M, Xing
H, Jiang J, Chen X, Yang T, Wang D, Ding P. Liquisolid technique and its
applications in pharmaceutics. Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2017
Mar 1;12(2):115-23.
3.
Spiraeas S,
Sadu S. Enhancement of prednisolone dissolution properties using liquisolid
compacts. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 1998 May 18;166(2):177-88.
4.
Jamkhandi
VG. Formulation and evaluation of immediate release tablet of carvedilol using
liquisolid compacts technique for solubility enhancement. Asian Journal of
Pharmaceutics (AJP). 2016 Sep 10;10(03).
5.
Lohithasu
D, Ramana JV, Girish P, Harsha IN, Madhu G, Lavanya K, Sri DS. A latest review
on liquisolid technique as a novel Approach. World Journal of Pharmaceutical
Research. 2014 Apr 15;3(4):479-93.
6.
Hentzschel
CM, Sakmann A, Leopold CS. Suitability of various excipients as carrier and
coating materials for liquisolid compacts. Drug development and industrial
pharmacy. 2011 Oct 1;37(10):1200.
7.
Vraníková
B, Svačinová P, Marushka J, Brokešová J, Holas O, Tebbens JD, Šklubalová Z. The
importance of the coating material type and amount in the preparation of
liquisolid systems based on magnesium aluminometasilicate carrier. European
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2021 Oct 1;165:105952.
8.
Javad Zadeh
Y, Siahi-Shadbad MR, Barzegar-Jalali M, Nokhodchi A. Enhancement of dissolution
rate of piroxicam using liquisolid compacts. Il Farmaco. 2005 Apr
1;60(4):361-5.
9.
Jadhav NR,
Irny PV, Patil US. Solid state behaviour of progesterone and its release from
Neusilin US2 based liquisolid compacts. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and
Technology. 2017 Apr 1; 38:97-106.
10.
Bhattacharyya
S, Ramachandran D. Solubility enhancement study of lumefantrine by formulation
of liquisolid compact using mesoporous silica as a novel adsorbent. Materials
Letters: X. 2022 Dec 1;16:100171.
11.
Vraníková
B, Pavloková S, Gajdziok J. Experimental design for determination of effects of
super disintegrant combinations on liquisolid system properties. Journal of
pharmaceutical sciences. 2017 Mar 1;106(3):817-25.
12. Sabri LA, Hussien AA. Formulation and In-Vitro
Characterization of Solidified Nebivolol Self-Nano emulsion using Liquisolid
Technique. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy. 2020 Mar 1;11(3).
13.
Khames A.
Investigation of the effect of solubility increase at the main absorption site
on bioavailability of BCS class II drug (risperidone) using liquisolid
technique. Drug delivery. 2017 Jan 1;24(1):328-38.
14.
Singh SK,
Srinivasan KK, Gowtham Rajan K, Prakash D, Gaikwad NB, Singare DS. Influence of
formulation parameters on dissolution rate enhancement of glyburide using
liquisolid technique. Drug development and industrial pharmacy. 2012 Aug
1;38(8):961-70
15. Thakur N, Khokra SL, Sharma D, Thakur NS,
Purohit R, Arya V. A review on pharmaceutical application of liquisolid
technique. Am. J. Pharmtech. Res. 2011; 1:1-8.
16. Yadav VB, Yadav AV. Liquisolid granulation
technique for tablet manufacturing: an overview. Journal of Pharmacy Research.
2009 Apr;2(4):670-4.
17.
Pawar JD,
Jagtap RS, Doijad RC, Pol SV, Desai JR, Jadhav VV, Jagtap SR. Liquisolid
compacts: a promising approach for solubility enhancement. Journal of Drug
Delivery and Therapeutics. 2017 Jul 15;7(4):6-11.
18.
Deshmukh
AS, Mahale VG, Mahajan VR. Liquisolid compact techniques: A Review. Research
Journal of Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Technology. 2014;6(3):161-6.
19. Pathak A, Goyal R, Agrawal P, Rajput S, Tiwari
G, Shivhare R. A review on liquisolid technology. World J Pharma Res. 2012 Jun
12;1(3):500-12.
20. Kumar Nagabandi V, Ramarao T, Jayaveera KN.
Liquisolid compacts: a novel approach to enhance bioavailability of poorly
soluble drugs. Int J Pharm Res Allied Sci. 2011;1(3):89-102.
21. Varshosaz, J., Ghassami, E.,
&Ahmadipour, S. (2018). Crystal engineering for enhanced solubility and
bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 24(21),
2473-2496.
22. Lipinski
CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ. Experimental and computational approaches
to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development
settings. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 1997 Jan 15;23(1-3):3-25.
23. Gorle
AP, Chopade SS. Liquisolid technology: preparation, characterization and
applications. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2020 Jun
15;10(3-s):295-307.
24.
Vogt,
M.; Kunath, K.; Dressman, J.B. Dissolution enhancement of fenofibrate by
micronization, cogrinding and spray-drying: Comparison with commercial
preparations. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2008, 68, 283–288
25.
Patel US, Patel KC. Liquisolid technique for
poorly soluble drugs. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research.
2013;2(1):145-59.
26.
Tiong N, Elkordy AA. Effects of liquisolid
formulations on dissolution of naproxen. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and
Biopharmaceutics. 2009 Nov 1;73(3):373-84.
27.
Kamalakkannan,
V.; Puratchikody, A.; Masilamani, K.; Senthilnathan, B. Solubility enhancement
of poorly soluble drugs by solid dispersion technique—A review. J. Pharm. Res.
2010, 3, 2314–2321.
28.
Spireas S, Sadu S. Enhancement of prednisolone
dissolution properties using liquisolid compacts. International Journal of
Pharmaceutics. 1998 May 18;166(2):177-88.
29.
Nokhodchi A, Hentzschel CM, Leopold CS. Drug
release from liquisolid systems: speed it up, slow it down. Expert opinion on
drug delivery. 2011 Feb 1;8(2):191-205.
30.
Patel UB, Modi DC, Shah DP. Liquisolid
compacts: A review. International Journal of Advances in Pharmaceutical.
2017;6(7):110-3.
31.
Bandari
S, Mittapalli RK, Gannu R, Rao YM. Oro dispersible tablets: An overview. Asian
journal of pharmaceutics, Jan 2008, 2-11.
32.
Reddy et al.
Formulation and evaluation of candesartan Immediate release tablets by
using liquisolid
Technique.WJPPS,2014,3(2): 2270-2282.
33.
Shailesh T.
Prajapati, Hitesh H. Bulchandani,DashrathM. Patel, Suresh K. Dumaniya, and
Chhaganbhai N. Patel. Formulation and Evaluation of
Liquisolid Compacts for Olmesartan Medoxomil. Journal of
Pharmaceutics.2013,1-9.
34.
Kamagoni K et
al. Preparation and enhancement of dissolution rate of amlodipine besylate and
valsartan using liquisolid technique. Pharmacie Globale (IJCP) 2013:
06(04),1-6.
35. Chella N, Narra N, Rama Rao T. Preparation and
characterization of liquisolid compacts for improved dissolution of telmisartan.
Journal of drug delivery. 2014;2014(1):692793.
36. Chella N, Shastri N, Tadikonda RR. Use of the
liquisolid compact technique for improvement of the dissolution rate of
valsartan. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B. 2012 Oct 1;2(5):502-8.
37. Manohar SD, Ramakrishna GA, Bhanudas SR.
Formulation and evaluation of liquisolid compact of eprosartan mesylate. World
J. Pharm. Res. 2015 Apr 30;4:763-82.
38. Manohar SD, Ramakrishna GA, Bhanudas SR.
Formulation and evaluation of liquisolid compact of eprosartan mesylate. World
J. Pharm. Res. 2015 Apr 30;4:763-82.
39. Khames A. Formulation and characterization of
eplerenone nanoemulsion liquisolids, an oral delivery system with higher
release rate and improved bioavailability. Pharmaceutics. 2019 Jan 18;11(1):40.
40.
Tiong N,Elkordy
AA.Effects of liquisolid formulation on dissolution of Naproxen.Eur J
Pharm Biopharm. 2009:73:373-84.
41.
A. V. Yadav et al.
Formulation and Evaluation of Orodispersible Liquisolid Compacts of
Aceclofenac Indian J.Pharm.
Educ. Res. 2010, 44(3),227-235.
42.
Kiran Thadkala et al.
Enhancement of Dissolution Rate of Nimesulide by Liquisolid Compaction
Technique. International Journal of PharmTech Research.2012,4(3), 1294-1302.
43.
Javad Zadeh
Y, Siahi-Shadbad MR, Barzegar-Jalali M, Nokhodchi A. Enhancement of dissolution
rate of piroxicam using liquisolid compacts. Il Farmaco. 2005 Apr
1;60(4):361-5.
44. Vittal GV, Deveswaran R, Bharath S, Basavaraj
BV, Madhavan V. Formulation and characterization of ketoprofen liquisolid
compacts by Box-Behnken design. International journal of pharmaceutical
investigation. 2012 Jul;2(3):150.
45. Regu V, Subudhi BB, Swain RP, Bhattacharjee A,
Karna N, Khan AS, Nanda N. Formulation Development and Evaluation of Liquisolid
Compacts For Ibuprofen Liquisolid Tablets. Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative
Results. 2023 Jan 1:559-71.
46.
Nazem NM, Shokri J, Nourani N, Zangi AR, Lam M,
Nokhodchi A, Javad Zadeh Y. Combining liquisolid and co-grinding techniques to
enhance the dissolution rate of celecoxib. Journal of Pharmaceutical
Innovation. 2023 Mar;18(1):300-9.
47. The Official Compendia of Standards. United States Pharmacopoeia
and National Formulary. Asian Edition. Washington, DC: United States
Pharmacopeial Convention, Incorporated; 2000. p. 546-47, 2148-49.
48.
Patric JS. Martin’s
Physical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 5th ed. Lippincott Williams and
Wilkins; 2003.
49. Manogar PG, Hari BV, Devi DR. Emerging
liquisolid compact technology for solubility enhancement of BCS class-II drug.
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2011 Dec 1;3(12):1604.
50. Hussain Y, Shah MN. Liquisolid Technique: a
Novel Tool to Develop Aceclofenac-Loaded Eudragit L-100 and RS-100-Based
Sustained Release Tablets. Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation. 2021
Dec;16:659-71.
51. Kumari N, Mishra S. A review on solubility
enhancement by liquisolid technique as a novel approach.
52.
T. Guan, Y. Miao, L. Xu, S. Yang, J. Wang,
H. He, X. Tang, C. Cai, H. Xu, Injectable nimodipine-loaded nanoliposomes:
preparation, lyophilization and characteristics, Int. J. Pharm. 410 (2011) 180–187
53. Bhattacharyya S, Ramachandran D. Solubility
enhancement study of lumefantrine by formulation of liquisolid compact using
mesoporous silica as a novel adsorbent. Materials Letters: X. 2022 Dec
1;16:100171.
54. Khaled KA, Asiri YA, El-Sayed YM. In vivo
evaluation of hydrochlorothiazide liquisolid tablets in beagle dogs.
International journal of pharmaceutics. 2001 Jul 3;222(1):1-6.
55.
Nokhodchi A, Hentzschel CM, Leopold CS. Drug
release from liquisolid systems: speed it up, slow it down. Expert opinion on
drug delivery. 2011 Feb 1;8(2):191-205.
56. Kala NP, Shaikh MT, Shastri DH, Shelat PK. A
Review on Liquisolid Systems. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2014
May 15;4(3):25-31.
57. Madhavi N, Likitha O, Iswariya VT, Swarnalatha
KM, Rao TR. A Review on Liqui-Solid Compaction of Solid Dispersion. Journal of
Coastal Life Medicine. 2022 Mar 31;10:536-45.
58. Pathak A, Goyal R, Agrawal P, Rajput S, Tiwari
G, Shivhare R. A review on liquisolid technology. World J Pharma Res. 2012 Jun
12;1(3):500-12.
59. Badawy MA, Kamel AO, Sammour OA. Use of biorelevant media
for assessment of a poorly soluble weakly basic drug in the form of liquisolid
compacts: in vitro and in vivo study. Drug Deliv 2016;23:818–827.
60. Ramenskaia GV, Shokhin IE, Savchenko AI, et al. The
dissolution test in biorelevant media as a prognostic tool for modeling of drug
behavior in vivo. Biomed Khim 2011;57:482–489.