Nanosuspension: A Comprehensive Review
Sayed
Anasali Israrali1*, Dr. Quazi Majaz Ahamad Aejazuddin, Abuzar Khan, Mansuri Jahid Siraj.
JIIU’s Ali Allana College of Pharmacy
Akkalkuwa, Dist-Nandurbar -425415, Maharashtra, India
*Correspondence: aanas7385@gmail.com ; Tel.:(+918805093547)
|
Article
Information
|
|
Abstract
|
|
Review Article
Received:
25/12/2024
Accepted:
28/12/2024
Published:
01/01/2025
Keywords
Nanosuspension,
TYPES,
Methods Of
Preparation,
Evaluation,
Marketed
products
|
|
Pharmaceutical
formulations that employ nanosuspension technology to increase the solubility
and bioavailability of poorly soluble medications are the main purpose of
this review paper. A medication that is poorly soluble in water is suspended
in a suitable dispersion medium stabilized by surfactants in nanosuspensions,
which are sub-micron colloidal systems. This method is used because it offers
advantages including improved pharmacokinetics, simplicity of administration,
and versatility in dosage form design, while addressing problems like low
bioavailability and solubility. Additionally, nanosuspensions offer important
therapeutic benefits for a variety of drug administration routes, such as
oral, parenteral, topical, ophthalmic, and pulmonary.
|
INTRODUCTION
A significant kind of pharmaceutical formulation, suspensions pose
numerous difficulties for formula development staff due to their intrinsic
structural instability as well as issues with manufacturing and packing.
Suspensions may be intended for parenteral, external, or oral delivery. The
continuous phase is usually made up of a finely split solid (individual
particles with sizes ranging from 0.5 to 5.0μ) suspended in a liquid or
semi-solid medium. Nowadays, a lot of suspensions are sold as dry powders,
which are "constituted" prior to use by adding predetermined
quantities of a vehicle. Stability issues are the primary reason for the
production of such "suspensions."
A crucial factor in the formation of suspensions is the disperse phase's
particle size. Topical suspensions should contain extremely fine particles to
prevent a grainy feel during application and to give the region they are
administered more coverage and protection. If the solid material is intended to
penetrate the skin, its small size will accelerate the rate of dissolution and,
consequently, the penetration. Particle sizes in suspensions intended for
ocular cavity introduction shouldn't exceed 10μ. The suspension may cause pain
or discomfort over this size, but below this, the patient has no pain. It is
important for injectable suspensions to have particles that are small enough to
fit through the syringe needle. Because they typically have a prolonged action,
needle-shaped particles are preferred in "depot" type products. [1]
Types
of suspensions:
1.According to the route of
administration :
• Since oral suspensions
are meant to be consumed orally, they need to have the right flavoring and
sweetener.
• Since topical suspensions are intended for external use, they must be devoid
of coarse particles.
• Parenteral suspensions should have the ability to be syringed and be sterile.
• Ophthalmic suspensions must to have extremely small particles and be sterile.
2. According to nature of
dispersed phase and methods of preparation:
Suspensions that comprise diffusible solids, in-diffusible solids,
weakly wet-table solids, precipitate-forming liquids, and chemical reaction
products are all categorized.
3. According
to nature of sediment:
Flocculated Suspensions:
In this kind, the solid particles in the dispersed phase group together
to form a network-like structure in the dispersion medium. No firm cake is
formed by the aggregates. since of their size, these aggregates settle quickly
since the sedimentation rate is high and the silt that forms is loose and
readily re-dispersible. Because the dispersed phase has a tendency to detach
from the dispersion medium, the suspension lacks elegance. Therefore, controlled
flocculation is preferred in order to maintain equilibrium between the rate of
sedimentation, the kind of sediment generated, and the suspension's
pourability.
Non
flocculated Suspensions:
Solid particles of this kind exist in the dispersion medium as distinct
entities. A firm cake is formed by the sediments. Since the rate of
sedimentation is modest, the solid drug particles settle slowly, and
redispersion becomes difficult as sediments finally accumulate. Because the
scattered phase stays suspended for a long time, giving the suspension a
uniform appearance, it is more elegant [1].
NANOSUPENSIONS:
The Greek word "nano" means "dwarf." A nano is one
billionth, or a factor of 10-9. Furthermore, 40% of the novel chemical entities
produced by drug discovery applications are lipophilic or poorly soluble in
water. Pharmaceutical scientists typically find it challenging to formulate
drugs that are poorly soluble in water.(2)
A
sub-micron colloidal system termed nanosuspension is made up of a medicine that
is poorly soluble in water and is suspended in a compatible medium for
dispersion that is stabilized by surfactants. Typically, inert colloidal
carriers such as polymeric resins make up nanosuspensions. They aid in
improving the solubility and, thus, the bioavailability of drugs. They are also
well-liked due to the fact that they are not irritating, unlike microemulsions.[3]
Because of its simplicity of administration, high patient compliance,
cost-effectiveness, minimal sterility restrictions, and flexibility in dosage
form design, the oral route is the most practical and widely used method for
drug delivery. The main issue in designing oral dosage forms for about 50% of
therapeutic compounds is their low bioavailability.[4]
An developing discipline in
all branches of science, engineering, and technology, nanotechnology is one of
the most significant areas of research and development in contemporary science.
It is a brand-new, all-encompassing field of study that blends the living
sciences with medicine.[4] By maintaining the medicine in the
necessary crystalline form with smaller particles, nanosuspension technology
speeds up the pace of dissolution. In addition to addressing the issues of low
solubility and low bioavailability, nanosuspension modifies the drug's
pharmacokinetics and enhances its efficacy and safety.[4]
BENEFITS
OF NANOSUSPENSIONS:
• Because of its broad
application and ease of use, it can be beneficial for drugs that are not
readily soluble in water.[5]
• It may be converted into suitable dosage forms such tablets, capsules,
pellets, hydro gel, and suppositories based on the formulator's requirements.(5)
• Tissue targeting and
rapid disintegration are made possible by the intravenous route of delivery.(5)
• The administration of oral nanosuspensions results in a rapid onset, a
decreased fed/fasted ratio, and improved bioavailability.
• Drugs with high log P values can be made
into nanosuspensions to improve their bioavailability. (5)
• A shift in biological
function brought on by excessive drug saturation and disintegration. (5)
• Batch-to-batch volatility is low and
production procedures are straightforward.
• Less tissue irritation
whether given intramuscularly or subcutaneously. (5)
• A stronger propensity to
stick, which enhances absorption.
• Site-specific distribution by surface modification of nanosuspension is a
potential. (5)
NEGATIVE
ASPECTS OF NANOSUSPENSIONS:
•
Physical instability, sedimentation, and compaction can all lead to issues.
Because of its weight, handling and shipment need caution.
• When taken as prescribed, a consistent and accurate dosage cannot be given
without suspension.[5]
Applications:
1.
Topical
formulations:
Using nanosuspensions in
topical treatments with supersaturated structures (better solubility of
saturation) enhanced drug diffusion pressure.[2]
Fig: For Topical formulation[6]
2. Oral-cavity formulations (paste, gel, patches):
A.
A. Small particles enhanced adherence and prolonged
residence for medications with inadequately high bioavailability in
conventional oral formulations.
B.
As bio
adhesion grew, inter-issue version decreased, dosage proportionality
improved, and availability rose.[2]
Fig: Gels for oral
formulation [2]
Fig: Patches for oral
formulation[2]
3. Parentral Drug Delivery:
In addition, the parenteral
medication delivery method makes use of nanotechnology. This method's benefit
is that, for poorly soluble medicines, it requires considerably smaller amount
of lethal cosolvent. When compared to the normal oral formulation and directing
the medicine to the macrophages, this may increase the therapeutic impact of
the medication. For the majority of the mycobacterium avium lines, the medicine
clofazimine is administered intravenously (IV) when the concentration in the
liver, spleen, and lungs reaches an excessive degree, or more than minimal
inhibitory awareness. In order to improve the bioavailability, tarazepide is
made as a nanosuspension rather than utilizing cyclodextrins and surfactants.[2]
Fig: IV for parentral drug delivery[2]
4.
Ocular delivery:
Compared to traditional
ocular dosage forms, nanosuspension of nanoparticles (NPs) has several
advantages, such as lower dosage, sustained drug release over an extended
period of time, decreased systemic toxicity, improved drug absorption because
of the nanoparticles' longer residence time on the corneal surface, higher drug
concentrations in the infected tissue, and suitability for poorly water-soluble
drugs. Additionally, patients tolerate smaller particles better than larger
ones, which suggests that nanoparticles may be auspicious drug carriers for
ophthalmic applications.[6]
Fig:
For ocular drug delivery[6]
5.
Pulmonary:
Drugs that are poorly
soluble in pulmonary secretions may benefit from delivery using nanosuspensions.
Current methods of pulmonary administration, including aerosols or dry powder
inhalers, have a number of drawbacks, such as limited diffusion at the desired
location, a shorter residence period, and many more, which can be overcome with
nanosuspensions. Budesonide and fluticasone had been effectively combined to
create a nanosuspension for pulmonary administration.[2]
Fig: For pulmonary drug
delivery[2]
6. Mucoadhesion of Nanoparticle:
When the nano suspension is
consumed orally, it forms a liquid medium and sticks to the mucosal surface
before being absorbed. It enhances bioavailability and targets the parasite
that is causing the git to persist. Such as buparvaquone inhibits
Cryptosporidiparvum.[2]
Fig: Mucoadhesive
nanoparticals [2]
Fig:
Methods for preparation of Nanosuspension[7]
Method
of preparation of Nanosuspension:
TECHNIQUES
FOR PREPARATION OF NANOSUSPENSIONS:[7]
Although theoretically
easier than liposomes and other traditional colloidal drug carriers,
nanosuspensions are said to be more economical. It is especially used for
medications that are poorly soluble and to produce a product that is more
physically stable. There are two opposite approaches for producing
nanosuspensions: "Bottom-up process technology" and "Top-down
process technology." From huge particles to microparticles to nanosized
particles, the top-down method employs a disintegration technique. High
pressure homogenization, media milling (nanocrystals), nanoedge, and nanopure
are a few examples.
Using a bottom-up approach, molecules are assembled into nanoparticles. Among
the examples are Method of Solvent-Antisolvent Extremely important fluid process
Emulsification Method of Solvent Evaporation Template for lipid emulsion or
micro-emulsion. The following are the main methods for creating nanosuspensions
that have been employed recently:
1.Top-down
process technology:
A.HIGH PRESSURE
HOMOGENIZATION:
It is the most popular technique for creating nanosuspensions of several
medications that are not very soluble in water. There are three steps involved.
Pre-suspension is created by first dispersing drug powders in stabilizer
solution, then homogenizing the pre-suspension at low pressure for pre-milling
in a high pressure homogenizer, and finally homogenizing at high pressure for
10 to 25 cycles to create nanosuspensions of the appropriate size. This idea
has led to the development of several techniques for creating nanosuspensions,
including Disso-cubes, Nano pure, Nano edge, and Nano jet.[7]
Homogenization in aqueous media (Disso
cubes):
Using a piston-gap type
high pressure homogenizer, R.H. Muller invented this method in 1999. This
technique uses a high pressure homogenizer with a nanosized aperture valve to
drive a drug and surfactant solution through it under pressure.
Principle:
The cavitation theory is
the foundation of this technique. The dispersion in a cylinder with a diameter
of 3 cm is abruptly forced through a 25µm thin opening.Bernoulli's law states
that a closed system's liquid flow volume per cross section is constant. Because
the diameter is reduced from 3 cm to 25 µm, dynamic pressure rises while static
pressure falls below the room temperature boiling point of water.At room
temperature, the water then begins to boil and produces gas bubbles, which
burst as the suspension exits the gap (a process known as cavitation) and the
air pressure returns to normal. The cavitation forces of the particles are
significant enough to transform the drug microparticles into nanoparticles.
Advantages:
1. It
prevents treated materials from eroding.
2. It works with medications that don't dissolve well in organic or aqueous
solutions.
Disadvantages:
1.
Preliminary processing, such as micronization, is necessary.
2. The need for expensive equipment raises the price of the dosage form.
Homogenization
in nonaqueous media (Nanopure):
Suspensions homogenized in
water-free medium or water mixes, such as PEG 400, PEG 1000, etc., are known as
nanopure. It is referred to as "deep freeze" homogenization because
it may be carried out at ambient temperature, 00°C, and below the freezing
point (-200°C).[7]
Nanoedge:
The simultaneous process of precipitation and homogenization is known as
nanoedge technology. The fundamental idea is the same as that of homogenization
and precipitation. The Nanoedge technology may be used to solve the main
drawbacks of the precipitation process, including crystal development and
long-term stability. It is possible to produce particles with improved
stability and reduced size quickly.[7]
Nanojet:
Also known as opposite
stream technology, it employs a chamber to split a stream of suspension into
two or more sections that merge at high pressure. Because of the tremendous
shear forces created during the operation, the particle size is decreased.[7]
B.MILLING
TECHNIQUES:
I
) Media Milling:
Liversidge (1992) was the first to create and report on this strategy.
This approach uses a high shear media mill to prepare the nanosuspensions. The
milling chamber revolved at a very high shear rate for at least two to seven
days at a regulated temperature after being loaded with the milling medium,
water, medication, and stabilizer. Glass, zirconium oxide, or strongly
cross-linked polystyrene resin make up the milling media. The drug is impacted
with the milling media, causing the drug's microparticles to split into
nanoparticles and creating high energy shear pressures. [7]
Advantages:
1. Drug
quantities ranging from 1 mg/ml to 400 mg/ml can be used to create both
extremely diluted and highly concentrated nanosuspensions.
2. The final nanosized product's dispersion at the nanoscale.
Disadvantages:
1. The
process of media milling takes a lot of time.
2. A small percentage of particles are micrometers in size.
3. The size and weight of the mill make scaling up difficult.
II)
Dry-Co-grinding:
A lot of nanosuspensions
are now made using the dry milling process. Dry-cogrinding is a simple,
cost-effective process that doesn't use organic solvents. Co-grinding improves
the surface polarity and changes a crystalline medication into an amorphous
one, which improves the physicochemical characteristics and dissolving of
poorly water soluble medicines. [7]
Advantages
1.
The method is simple and doesn't require an organic
solvent.
2.
Need little
time to grind.
Disadvantages:
1. Production of milling media residue.
C.
EMULSIFICATION-SOLVENT EVAPORATION TECHNIQUE:
This method entails making
a drug solution and then emulsifying it in a different liquid that isn't a
solvent for the medication. The substance precipitates as the solvent
evaporates. A high-speed stirrer may be used to generate strong shear forces,
which will regulate crystal development and particle aggregation. [7]
D.
PRECIPITATION:
Precipitation has been used
in the past ten years to create submicron particles, particularly for
medications that are not readily soluble. Prior to being combined with a
miscible antisolvent in the presence of surfactants, the medication is first
dissolved in a solvent. When a drug solution is quickly added to the
antisolvent, the drug becomes suddenly super-saturated and forms ultrafine
crystalline or amorphous drug solids. [7]
Benefits:
Include economical production, ease of scaling
up, and a straightforward procedure.
Drawbacks:
The inclusion of a
surfactant is necessary to restrict the growth of crystals.
The drug has to dissolve in at least one solvent.
E. SUPERCRITICAL FLUID PROCESS:
The technologies of
solubilization and nanosizing using the super critical fluid process were able
to reduce the particle size considerably. Supercritical fluids (SCF) are thick,
noncondensable fluids with temperatures and pressures higher than their
critical values (Tc and Tp).Drug particles can be micronized to the submicron
level with this method. Recent developments in the SCF method have made it
possible to produce nanoparticulate suspensions with diameters ranging from 5
to 2000 nm. This technology's use in the pharmaceutical sector is limited by
the high pressure needed for these procedures and the low solubility of weakly
water-soluble medications and surfactants in supercritical CO2. [7]
F. MELT EMULSIFICATION METHOD:
This approach creates an emulsion
by dispersing the drug in the stabilizer's aqueous solution, heating it over
the drug's melting point, and homogenizing it. In order to keep the emulsion's
temperature above the drug's melting point, the sample holder was wrapped in a
heating tape that had a temperature controller attached. The emulsion was
subsequently chilled on an ice bath or gradually to room temperature. [7]
Advantages: In contrast to the solvent evaporation method, the melt emulsification
approach completely eliminates the use of organic solvents in the manufacturing
process.
Disadvantages: Compared to solvent evaporation, there are less compliant objects and
bigger particles formed.
G. LIPID EMULSION/MICROEMULSION
TEMPLATE:
This
method works effectively for drugs that dissolve in volatile organic solvents
or partially water miscible solvents. In this procedure, the medication is
dissolved in a suitable organic solvent and then emulsified in an aqueous phase
using suitable surfactants. The organic solvent was then gradually evaporated
under reduced pressure to produce drug particles that precipitated in the
aqueous phase and created the aqueous suspension of the drug in the required
particle size. Nanosuspensions can then be made by suitably diluting the
resultant suspension. Additionally, microemulsions can be used as templates to
make nanosuspensions. An interfacial layer of surfactant
and co-surfactant
stabilizes the thermodynamic stability and isotropic clarity of microemulsions,
which are dispersions of two immiscible liquids, such as water and oil.
Either the drug is placed into the internal
phase or the drug is intimately mixed into the pre-formed microemulsion to make
it saturated. The drug nanosuspension is produced by appropriately diluting the
microemulsion. Lipid emulsions are useful as templates for the generation of
nanosuspensions because they are simple to make by regulating the emulsion
droplet and are simple to scale up. However, using organic solvents has an
adverse effect on the environment, and a lot of stabilizer or surfactant is
needed. [7]
Advantages
:
High drug
solubilization
1.
Extended shelf life
2. Simple to produce.
Disadvantages:
1.
Hazardous solvent use
2. A lot of stabilizers and surfactants are used.
H. SOLVENT EVAPORATION:
The solvent evaporation
method creates polymer solutions in emulsions and volatile solvents. However,
the usage of dichloromethane and chloroform in previous years has been replaced
with ethyl acetate, which has a superior toxicological profile. When the
solvent for the polymer evaporates, the emulsion transforms into a suspension
of nanoparticles that can permeate the continuous phase of the emulsion. One of
the two primary approaches utilized in conventional procedures for emulsion
production is the creation of single emulsions, such as oil-in-water (o/w), or
double emulsions, such as (w/o)/w. The solvent must be evaporating using
continuous magnetic stirring at ambient temperature or at decreased pressure
after high-speed homogenization or ultrasonication. After being collected by
ultracentrifugation, the solidified nanoparticles were lyophilized after being
cleaned of additives like surfactants using distilled water. The polymer
concentration, stabilizer, and homogenizer speed all had an impact on the
particle size.[7]
2.BOTTOM-UP PROCESS:
Increasing particle size
from the molecular to the nanoscale area is one method of reaching nanosize.
The term "bottom-up technique" describes the traditional
"hydrosol" or precipitation procedures. The precipitation method is
used to dissolve the drug in an organic solvent, and the resultant solution is
mixed with a miscible anti-solvent. The drug's poor solubility in the
water-solvent combination causes it to precipitate. The primary problem is that
the crystal growth needs to be controlled by adding surfactant in order to stop
the formation of microparticles during the precipitation process. [5]
Advantages:
1. Using basic and affordable equipment
2. One advantage of precipitation over other
nanosuspension guiding methods is its higher saturation solubility. [5]
Disadvantages:
1Drugs that are not adequately soluble in fluid and
non-watery conditions are no longer present in precipitation systems. In this
system, the medication should dissolve in at least one dissolvable that is
miscible with the non-solvent[5].
2. Prevent Ostwald ripening, which is brought on by
unique saturation solubilities close to particles of varying sizes, from
causing crystal formation.[5]
PRECIPITATION
METHOD:
One common technique for creating poorly
soluble submicron drug particles is precipitation. In this technique, the
medication is dissolved in a solvent before the solution is added to the
solvent, which at first the drug cannot dissolve in. The drug rapidly becomes
supersaturated in the solution and creates an ultrafine amorphous or
crystalline drug when the solution is swiftly added to a solvent, usually
water. Both crystal growth and nucleus formation, which are mostly
temperature-dependent processes, are involved in this process. Low crystal
growth rate and high nucleation rate are necessary to produce a stable solution
with tiny particles.[5]
Fig: Schematic representation of precipitation method[5]
Evaluation methods for Nanosuspension:
1. In-vitro evaluation:
1. Particle
size and size distribution
2. Particle
charge (Zeta Potential)
3. Crystalline
state and morphology
4. Saturation
solubility and dissolution velocity.
5. Density
6. ph value
7. Droplet size
8. viscosity
measurement
9. Stability of
nanosuspension
2. In-vivo evaluation
3. Evaluation for surface-modified
nanosuspension:
1. Surface
hydrophilicity
2. Adhesion
properties
3. Interaction
with body proteins.
4. Quality assurance
5. In process quality control
1. In-vitro evaluation:
1. Mean
particle size and size distribution:
Photon Correlation
Spectroscopy (PCS) is used to estimate the average size of the particles and
the breadth of the variation in particle size, also known as the Polydispersity
Index. The polydispersity index (PI) and particle size control the biological
performance, dissolving rate, and saturation solubility. It has been
demonstrated that variations in particle size alter dissolving velocity and
saturation solubility. PCS only monitors particle sizes between 3 nm and 3 μm.
Although PCS is a flexible method, its measurement range is limited. Laser
Diffractometry (LD) is used to study nanosuspensions in addition to PCS
analysis. [8]
2. Particle charge (zeta potential):
Determining a
nanosuspension's zeta potential is vital because it provides insight into how
the medication and stabilizer interact to control the suspension's potential.
An electrostatically stabilized nanosuspension requires an ideal zeta potential
of 30 mV to provide adequate stability, while a mixed electrostatic and 20 mV
nanosuspension is preferred.[8]
3. Crystalline state and particle morphology:
Assessing the amount of an
amorphous drug's change in physical state is a different application for X-Ray
Diffraction (XRD). The crystalline structure is ascertained by Differential
Scanning Calorimetry (DSC). Measuring the amount of amorphous drug produced
during the creation of nanosuspensions is crucial since drug particles change
into an amorphous state as they are made.[8]
4. Solubility and Dissolution velocity :
Enhanced saturated state
solubility and dissolving velocity are the primary benefits of nanosuspensions.
They are investigated at varying pH levels in various physiological solutions.
Increases in saturation solubility can be explained by the Kelvin equation and
the Ostwald-Freundlich equations. Determining these metrics helps evaluate the
formulation's performance in vivo.[8]
5. Density:
One crucial factor is the
formulation's specified gravity or volume. The existence of trapped air inside
the formulation's structure is frequently indicated by a drop in volume. It is
important to use a homogeneous, well-mixed formulation when measuring volume at
a certain temperature; a precision hydrometer makes this easier.[9]
6.
pH Value:
To reduce "pH
drift" and electrode surface coating with suspended particles, the pH
value of the aqueous formulation should be measured at a certain temperature
and only when settling equilibrium has been attained. To stabilize the pH,
electrolyte shouldn't be introduced to the formulation's exterior phase.[9]
7.
Droplet Size:
Either electron microscopy
or the light scattering approach can be used to determine the droplet size
distribution of micro emulsion vesicles. dynamic light scattering
spectrophotometer that use a 632 nm-wavelength neon laser.[9]
8.
Viscosity Measurement:
A Brookfield type rotating
viscometer may be used to evaluate the viscosity of lipid-based formulations of
various compositions at various shear rates and temperatures. The samples for
the measurement must be submerged in a thermobath that keeps the instrument's
sample chamber at 370 C. [9]
9.
Stability of Nanosuspension:
The drug crystals aggregate
due to the high surface energy of the nanoparticles. By creating a steric or
ionic barrier, the stabilizer's primary job is to completely soak the drug
molecules in order to stop Ostwald ripening and agglomeration of the
Nanosuspension and create a formulation that is physically stable. Stabilizers
that are commonly employed in nanosuspensions include lecithin, polyoleate,
poloxamer, cellulosics, and povidones. When creating parenteral
nanosuspensions, lecithin can be the better option.[9]
2. In-Vivo Biological Performance:
Establishing an
in-vitro/in-vivo connection and monitoring the drug's efficacy in vivo are
essential study components, regardless of the route and administration
mechanism employed. In the case of intravenously administered nanosuspensions,
it is crucial since the drug's in-vivo behavior is dependent on the
distribution of its organs, which depends on its hydrophobicity and
interactions with plasma proteins, among other surface properties. In
actuality, the key element influencing organ distribution is acknowledged to be
the qualitative and quantitative makeup of the protein absorption pattern seen
following intravenous injection of nanoparticles. Therefore, appropriate
methods must be employed to assess the surface characteristics and protein
interactions in order to get insight into invivo behavior. Surface
hydrophobicity may be assessed using methods like hydrophobic interaction
chromatography, whereas 2-D PAGE can be used to detect protein adsorption both
quantitatively and qualitatively following intravenous administration of drug
nanosuspensions in animals.[10]
The medication and delivery
method are particular to the in vivo assessment of the nanosuspensions.
Typically, the medication was administered by the prescribed method, and
HPLC-UV visible Spectrophotometry was used to measure the drug in the plasma
levels.[8]
3.Quality Assurance (QA):
A wide
range of elements that either separately or in combination impact a product's
quality are taken into account by the broad notion of quality assurance. In
order to guarantee the proper quality of the finished product, this method
critically examines what has happened yesterday, what is occurring today, and
what will happen tomorrow. A minor subset of quality assurance, quality control
(QC) deals with sampling, testing, and documenting both during and after
manufacture. To guarantee a high-quality product each and every time, quality
control is the monitoring process by which manufacturers measure actual quality
performance, compare it to standards, and address the reasons for deviations
from standards. Based on its purpose, a quality control system can be separated
into two sections: final quality control and in-process quality control.[11]
4. In Process Quality Control (IPQC):
Suspensions' Ipqc Process
quality control involves keeping an eye on important manufacturing process
variables to guarantee the end product's quality and to provide the required
guidance in the event that a difference is discovered. To guarantee that a
predictable portion of each output cycle falls within the acceptable standard
range, quality control and production staff create and document controls in
process manufacturing. The following has to be specified in order for
in-process quality control to operate properly.Which procedure has to be
watched, and when? How many samples should be collected for analysis, and how
often should they be taken? Each sample's quantitative quantities,
allowable fluctuation, etc.[11]
Marketed products of Nanosuspension: [12]
|
Trade name/company
|
Drug
|
Dosage form
|
Nanosuspension
method
|
Indication
|
|
Abraxane®/Abraxia
Biosciences
|
paclitaxel
|
Freeze dried powder for inj.
|
NabTM
|
Metastatic breast cancer
|
|
Cesamet®
|
Lilly
Nabilone
|
Capsule
|
Co-precipitation
|
Antiemetic
|
|
Emend®/Merck
|
Aprepiant
|
Capsule
|
Nanocrystal®Elan Nanosystems
|
Antiemetic
|
|
Giris-PEG®
/Novartis
|
Griseofulvin
|
Tablet/Oral
|
Coprecipittation
|
antifungal
|
|
Invega
Sustenna®/ Johnson & Johnson
|
Palperidone palmitate
|
Liquid nanosuspension
|
High pressure homogenization
|
Schizophrenia
|
|
Rapammune®/Wyeth
|
Sirolimus
|
Tablet
|
Nanocrystal®Elan
Nanosystems
|
Immunosuppressant
|
|
Tricor®/Abbott
|
Fenofibrate
|
Tablet
|
Nanocrystal®Elan Nanosystems
|
Hypercholesterolemia
|
Technology and
Patent for Nanosuspension:[12]
CONCLUSION:
Drugs
that are hydrophobic or poorly soluble in organic and aqueous solvents can have
their low solubility and bioavailability issues resolved commercially by
nanosuspension. The modes of administration for nanosuspensions include oral,
parenteral, pulmonary, ophthalmic, and topical. A nanosuspension changes the
drug's pharmacokinetics, improving its safety and effectiveness while also
improving the drug's solubility, bioavailability, and absorption. Its
therapeutic benefits include a straightforward preparation process, a lower
need for excipients, and an improvement in the drug's dissolving rate and
saturation solubility. As oral formulations and non-oral administration
advance, nanosuspensions will remain of interest due to their numerous uses,
easy production technologies, and drug delivery capabilities.
REFERENCE
1. Desale
Praneta, Nikam Rutuja, Shirsath Kamini, Patil Bhagyashri, Kele Divya, Ahire
Kalyani, Rathod Satnam and Yadav Dipali.
Pharmaceutical suspensions: A review. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry
2019; 8(1): 952-955.
2. Akshata
A Patil, Trupti M Naik, Komal B Sutar. A
complete review on nanosuspensions: a novel drug delivery system and
fenofibrate as a model drug. International Journal of Pharmacy and
Pharmaceutical Research. ISSN 2349-7203.
3. Neha
Tyagi, N.V Satheesh Madhav. FORMULATION
AND EVALUATION OF ZIDOVUDINE NANOSUSPENSIONS USING A NOVEL BIO POLYMER FROM THE
SEEDS OF BUCHANANIA LANZAN. Journal of Drug Delivery & Therapeutics; 2013,
3(4), 85-88.
4. AASIYA
NAHAS et al. A Review on Nanosuspension: A Promising Alternative Novel Approach
of Biphasic Liquid Dosage Form for The Delivery of Hydrophobic Drugs.
International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Research. June 2021
Vol.:21, Issue:3.
5. Vidyadhari
jakka, gayatriramyamunagala, durga spvn pavani patnala, rajesh kuruba.
Nanosuspensions: a stratergy to increase the solubility and bioavailability of
poorly water-soluble drugs. Asian j pharm clin res, vol 16, issue 5, 2023,
33-40.
6. Kumar
Bishwajit Sutradhar, Sabera Khatun, and Irin Parven Luna. Increasing
Possibilities of Nanosuspension. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of
Nanotechnology Volume 2013, Article ID 346581, 12 pages.
7. G.
Geetha, u. Poojitha, k. Arshad ahmed khan. Various techniques for preparation
of nanosuspension- a review. International journal of pharma research &
review, sept 2014; 3(9):30-37.
8. Akanksha
Chandra, Rajesh Kumar Soni, Upendra Sharma, S.K. Jain. NANOSUSPENSION: AN
OVERVIEW. Journal of Drug Delivery & Therapeutics; 2013, 3(6), 162-167.
9. Sarika
v khandbahale. A review- nanosuspasion technology in drug delivery system.
Asian journal of pharmaceutical research. Volume-9, issue-2, year-2019.
10. Rupali
L.Shid, Shashikant.N.Dhole, Nilesh Kulkarni, Santosh L.Shid. Nanosuspension: A
Review. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research.
22(1), Sep – Oct 2013; n- 20, 98-106.
11. Hawale
Pratisha Bibhishan, Ms. S. A Ghadage , Santosh Jain. A REVIEW ON PHARMACEUTICAL
SUSPENSION. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts. Volume 11,
Issue 5 May 2023.
12. Shery
Jacob , Anroop B. Nair and Jigar Shah. Emerging role of nanosuspensions in drug
delivery systems. Biomaterials Research. (2020) 24:3.