Article in HTML

Cite this article:
Dr. Sundhararajan R, L K. Dhivya*, Mohan. N, Paul Christober. M, Surya Prakash. S, Tamil selvan. Evaluation of In-vitro Anti-diabetic activity in Ethanolic Stem Extract of Euphobia hirta. IJRPAS, February 2026; 5(2): 88-92.

  View PDF

Please allow Pop-Up for this website to view PDF file.




Evaluation of In-vitro Anti-diabetic activity in Ethanolic Stem Extract of Euphobia hirta

Dr. Sundhararajan R, L K. Dhivya*, Mohan. N, Paul Christober. M,

Surya Prakash. S, Tamil selvan. P

Mohammed Sathak College of Pharmacy, Chennai, Tamilnadu

 

*Correspondence: lkdhivya97@gmail.com

DOI: https://doi.org/10.71431/IJRPAS.2026.5207

Article Information

 

Abstract

Research Article

Received: 24/02/2026

Accepted: 03/03/2026

Published:06/03/2026

 

Keywords

Euphorbia hirta,

Alpha amylase,

Alpha glucosidase,

Antidiabetic activity,

Ethanolic extract.

 

 

Ethanolic extract of Euphorbia hirta  where  evaluated for their carbohydrate enzyme inhibition, it is the key indicator for anti-diabetic potential. The inhibitory activity of EEEH against carbohydrate-digesting enzymes was evaluated and compared with the standard drug acarbose. EEEH exhibited moderate α-amylase inhibitory activity, with an IC₅₀ value of 1.16 mg/mL, indicating measurable enzyme suppression. In comparison, acarbose demonstrated significantly stronger inhibition, as reflected by a lower IC₅₀ value of 0.42 mg/mL. The inhibitory activity of EEEH against α-glucosidase was evaluated and compared with the standard drug acarbose. EEEH exhibited moderate α-glucosidase inhibitory activity, with an IC₅₀ value of 1.21 mg/mL, indicating appreciable enzyme suppression. In contrast, acarbose showed stronger inhibitory potential, as evidenced by a lower IC₅₀ value of 0.44 mg/mL.

 

INTRODUCTION

Euphorbia hirta Linn. (E. hirta) belongs to the Euphorbiaceae family. In India, E. hirta is commonly distributed in many provinces of the southern area. Many investigations have demonstrated that this plant has been widely used as traditional medicine to treat many diseases, including wound healing, gastrointestinal disorders, tumors, etc. Additionally, this herb was used as a traditional medicine in the treatment of diabetes for a long time.

In Vitro Antidiabetic activity

Controlling blood glucose levels, particularly postprandial (after-meal) hyperglycemia, is a major therapeutic goal in diabetes management. Among various strategies, the inhibition of digestive enzymes involved in carbohydrate metabolism specifically alpha-amylase and alpha-glucosidase- has emerged as an effective approach.

 

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

COLLECTION OF PLANT MATERIAL

The Euphorbia hirta were obtained from garden and authenticated to verify their botanical identity. Once authenticated, the E.hirta were thoroughly cleaned, shade-dried, and ground into a fine powder.

PREPARATION OF PLANT EXTRACT

A total of 100 grams of the powdered E.hirta material was subjected to extraction using ethanol as the solvent.

The powdered E.hirta were macerated in 500 mL of ethanol acetate for 72 hours at room temperature with periodic stirring. After the extraction, the mixture was filtered using Whatman No. 1 filter paper to remove the plant residues. The filtrate was concentrated using a rotary evaporator under reduced pressure at 40°C until a semi-solid residue was formed. The dried extracts was collected, weighed, and stored in an airtight container at 4°C for further in vitro analysis.

ASSAY AND IVITRO TEST

IN VITRO A-AMYLASE INHIBITION ASSAY

 A total of 250 μL of sample  was placed in a tube and 250 μL of 0.02 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.9) containing α-amylase solution (0.5 mg/mL) was added. This solution was pre- incubated at 25 °C for 10 min, after which 250 μL of 1% starch solution in 0.02 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.9) was added at timed intervals and then further incubated at 25 °C for 10 min. The reaction was terminated by adding 500 μL of dinitrosalicylic acid (DNSA) reagent. The tubes were then incubated in boiling water for 5 min and cooled to room temperature. The reaction mixture was diluted with 5 mL distilled water and the absorbance was measured at 540 nm using spectrophotometer. A control was prepared using the same procedure replacing the sample with distilled water. Acarbose standard was also run in the same manner.

The -amylase inhibitory activity was calculated as percentage inhibition:

The -amylase inhibitory activity was calculated as percentage inhibition:

                           Abs 540 (control) – Abs 540 (sample)

Inhibition (%) = ---------------------------------------------- × 100

                                           Abs 540(control)

Concentrations of sample resulting in 50% inhibition of enzyme activity (IC50) were determined graphically.

IN VITRO Α-GLUCOSIDASE INHIBITION ASSAY

 Yeast α‐glucosidase (0.7 U) dissolved in 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) containing 2 g/l bovine serum albumin, and 0.2 g/l NaN3, and 5 mM p-nitrophenyl‐ α‐D‐glucopyranoside in the same buffer (pH 7.0) were used as an enzyme and a substrate solution, respectively. The enzyme solution (2000 μl) and 100 μl of the test sample at various concentrations (20 to 100 μl/mL) were mixed, and absorbance at 405 nm was

measured using a spectrophotometer. After incubation for 5 min, 50 μl of the substrate solution was added and incubated for an additional 5 min. The increase in absorbance from time zero was measured, and inhibitory activity was calculated as a percentage of the blank control. The % inhibition was calculated using the following formula,

                              Abs 405 (Control) – Abs 405 (extract)

Inhibition (%) = -------------------------------------------------- × 100

                                            Abs 405(control)

RESULT AND DISCUSSION

Table 1: In-vitro α-amylase inhibition Assay

Concentration (mg/mL)

α-amylase inhibition percentage

EEEH

Acarbose

0.2

7.66±0.61

40.67±1.38

0.4

14.70±0.93

54.57±1.30

0.6

26.19±1.57

70.59±2.24

0.8

34.01±1.28

81.29±2.14

1

43.09±1.19

93.02±2.46

                        The values are means of triplicate experiments ± standard deviation.

The inhibitory activity of EEEH against carbohydrate-digesting enzymes was evaluated and compared with the standard drug acarbose. EEEH exhibited moderate α-amylase inhibitory activity, with an IC₅₀ value of 1.16 mg/mL, indicating measurable enzyme suppression. In comparison, acarbose demonstrated significantly stronger inhibition, as reflected by a lower IC₅₀ value of 0.42 mg/mL.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 1: In-vitro α-amylase inhibition assay

 

 

 

 

Table 2: In-vitro α-glucosidase inhibition Assay

Concentration (mg/mL)

α-glucosidase inhibition percentage

EEEH

Acarbose

0.2

13.57±0.93

40.19±2.79

0.4

18.28±1.08

51.11±2.50

0.6

24.35±1.71

69.53±2.15

0.8

35.14±1.47

80.16±2.85

1

41.25±2.16

92.35±2.47

                             The values are means of triplicate experiments ± standard deviation.

The inhibitory activity of EEEH against α-glucosidase was evaluated and compared with the standard drug acarbose. EEEH exhibited moderate α-glucosidase inhibitory activity, with an IC₅₀ value of 1.21 mg/mL, indicating appreciable enzyme suppression. In contrast, acarbose showed stronger inhibitory potential, as evidenced by a lower IC₅₀ value of 0.44 mg/mL.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 2: In-vitro α-glucosidase inhibition assay

CONCLUSION

EEEH exhibited moderate α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitory activity these indicating appreciable enzyme suppression, that shows the pharmacological profile of existing antidiabetic drugs but from a natural orign, making it a potential candidate for functional food or phytopharmaceutical intrests.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thanks to management and staffs of Mohamed Sathak AJ College of Pharmacy Chennai, Tamil Nadu,

India for providing necessary facilities and full support throughout the research in a successful manner.

REFERENCES       

1.Kausar, J.; Muthumani, D.; Hedina, A.; Ramasamy, S.; Anand, V. Review of the phytochemical and

   pharmacological activities of Euphorbia hirta Linn. Pharmacogn. J. 2016, 8, 310–313. [CrossRef]

2. Sharma, M.; Sheliya, M.A.; Begum, R.; Pillai, K.K.; Aeri, V.; Mir, S.R.; Ali, A.; Sharma, M. In vitro

    α-glucosidase and α-amylase inhibition by aqueous, hydroalcoholic, and alcoholic extract of Euphorbia hirta L. Drug Dev. Ther. 2016, 7, 26. [CrossRef]

3.Sharma, N.K.; Dey, S.; Prasad, R. In vitro antioxidant potential evaluation of Euphorbia hirta L.

    Pharmacologyonline 2007, 1, 91–98.

4. Kumar, S.; Malhotra, R.; Kumar, D. Euphorbia hirta: Its chemistry, traditional and medicinal uses,

    and pharmacological activities. Pharmacogn. Rev. 2010, 4, 58–61. [CrossRef]

5. Tran, N.; Tran, M.; Truong, H.; Le, L. Spray-Drying Microencapsulation of High Concentration of Bioactive Compounds Fragments from Euphorbia hirta L. Extract and Their Effect on Diabetes Mellitus. Foods 2020, 9, 881. [CrossRef]

6. McCue P.P and Shetty, K. “Inhibitory effects of rosmarinic acid extracts on porcine pancreatic

    amylase in vitro,” Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 101–106, 2004.



Related Images: