INTRODUCTION –
High
Performance Liquid Chromatography has evolved into one of the most potent
analytical chemistry tools available. It is capable of separating, identifying,
and quantifying the compounds present in any liquid-soluble sample. HPLC stands
for high performance liquid chromatography.The most precise analytical methods
widely used for quantitative and qualitative analysis of drug product.[1] The
sample is separated based on differences in migration rates through the column
caused by different partitions of the sample Between the stationary and mobile
phases. Depending on the partitioning
behaviour of various components Elution occurs at various times. The procedure
the Russians were the first to develop chromatography M.S Tswett, a botanist,
invented High Performance Liquid in 1903.1Chromatography is more adaptable than
gas chromatography. because (a) it is not limited to volatile and
non-volatile thermally stable samples,
as well as (b) the selection of mobile and The range of stationary phases is
broader. Figure-1 depicts a schematic diagram of an HPLC system HPLC is more
efficient than traditional LC techniques distinguished by:
•
Excellent resolution. Glass, stainless steel, and a small diameter (4.6 mm).or
columns made of titanium.
• Column
packing with small (3, 5, and 6) column Particles with a diameter of 10m.
•
Relatively high inlet pressures and precise
The movement of the mobile phase.
•
Continuous flow detectors that can handle small flow rates and detection of
extremely small amounts.
• Quick
analysis.[2]
•HPLC Method Development:
When
there are no official methods for a new product, methods are developed.
Alternative methods for existing (non-pharmacopoeial) products are to reduce
cost and time in order to improve precision and ruggedness. When an alternate
method is proposed to replace an existing procedure, comparative laboratory
data, including merits and demerits, is made available. The HPLC-method
attempts to separate and quantify the main active drug, any reaction
impurities, all available synthetic intermediates, and any degradants.
Method
development steps are as follows.
•Understanding
the Physicochemical properties of a drug molecule.
•Choosing
chromatographic conditions.
•Developing an analytical strategy. Sample
preparation.
•Method
improvement
•Method
verification[3]
understanding
the physicochemical properties of drug molecules:
A drug
molecule’s physicochemical properties are important in method development. To
develop a method, one must first investigate the physical properties of the
drug molecule, such as its solubility, polarity, pKa, and pH. Polarity is a
compound’s physical property. It aids an analyst in determining the solvent and
mobile phase composition. 6 The polarity of molecules can explain molecule
solubility. Solvents that are polar, such as water, and nonpolar, such as
benzene, do not mix. Like dissolves like, which means that materials with
similar polarities dissolve in each other. The analyte solubility is used to
select diluents. The pH value is commonly used to define a substance’s acidity
or basicity.[3]
Choosing chromatographic conditions
During
initial method development, a set of initial conditions (detector, column,
mobile phase) is chosen to generate the sample’s first “scouting”
chromatograms. These are typically based on reversed-phase separations on a C18
column with UV detection. At this point, a decision should be made whether to
develop an isocratic or a gradient method.[3]
Column
selection
The
column is at the heart of an HPLC system. Throughout methodology development,
dynamical a column can have the best result on analyte resolution. Generally,
square measure fashionable reverse part HPLC columns created by packing the
column housing with spherical square-measuring colloid beads coated with The
stationary part is hydrophobic. The stationary portion is introduced to the
matrix by reacting a chlorosilane with the On the colloid surface, hydroxyl
radical teams present. In general the character of the stationary part has the
best effect on Property, potency, and extraction are all issues of capability.
There Many different types of matrices are square measured for support of the
stationary component, as well as silicon oxide, polymers, and aluminium oxide
is a type of oxide. The most commonly used matrix is silicon oxide For HPLC
columns.The silicon oxide’s nature, form, and particle size aid in the
separation of effects. Smaller particles accumulate in a greater number of
theoretical plates Separation potency. However, the use of smaller
Additionally, particles result in accumulated backpressure. During action and
the column more simply Becomes obstructed. The stationary part in reverse part
action is non-polar.As a result, the mobile part is polar, resulting in polar
peaks Typically, previous non-polar peaks are rinsed. To create a On silicon
oxide, a stationary part is used for reverse part action Support, the square
measure of free silanols reacted with a To introduce the chlorosilane with
hydrophobic practicality Surface that is not polar. Solely due to steric
constraints Approximately one-third of the surface silanols Square measure
Derivatized. The remaining free silanols will interact with each other Peak
tailing is caused by analytes. Normally, when the Column derivatization with
the desired stationary part, The column is then further reacted with
chlorotrimethylsilane.To complete the capping of the remaining free silanols
and improve the Column effectiveness[4]
Buffer
selection
The
desired pH typically governs the buffer selection. The typical pH range for
reversed-phase on silica-based packing is 2 to 8. It is critical that the
buffer has a pKa close to the desired pH because
buffers control pH best at their pKa. A general rule is to select a buffer with
a pKa value of 2 units of the desired mobile phase Ph.[5]
Concentration
of the Buffer
For small
molecules, a buffer concentration of 10-50 mM is usually adequate. In general,
no more With a buffer, less than 50% organic should be used. This depends on
the particular buffer as well as its concentration. Phosphoric acid and its
sodium or potassium salt The most widely used buffer systems are potassium
salts. For reversed-phase HPLC. Sulfonate buffers can be useful. When
analysing, replace phosphonate buffers Compounds containing organophosphate.
Mobile
Phase Selection: The mobile phase has an effect on resolution,
selectivity, and efficiency. The composition of the mobile phase (or the
strength of the solvent) is critical. In RP-HPLC separation, this plays a role.
Acetonitrile (ACN) (ACN),Methanol (MeOH) and tetrahydrofuran (THF) are examples
of solvents-blocking solvents are commonly used in RP-HPLC.The cut-off
wavelengths are 190, 205, and 212nm, respectively. These Water is miscible with
solvents. Combination of The best first choice is acetonitrile and water.During
the method development phase, you will be mobile.[6]
Selection
of detector
The detector
is an essential component of HPLC. The chemical nature of the analysts,
potential interference, detection limit required, availability and/or cost of
the detector all influence detector selection. The UV-Visible detector is
versatile and dual-wavelength.For HPLC, an absorbance detector is used. This
detector provides the high sensitivity required for routine UV-based
applications to low-level Identification and quantification of impurities. The
Photodiode Array (PDA) Detector provides advanced optical detection for Waters.
Solutions for analytical HPLC, preparative HPLC, and LC/MS systems. Its
integrated software and optics innovations deliver high performance.
Sensitivity to chromatography and spectroscopy. The Refractive Index (RI)
Detector has a high sensitivity, stability, and reproducibility, making it an
ideal solution for analysing components with little or no UV absorption. The
Multi-Wavelength Fluorescence Detector provides high sensitivity and
selectivity in fluorescence detection for quantifying low concentrations of
target compounds.[7]
Collection
and preparation of the sample:
Ideally,
the sample should be dissolved in the initial mobile phase. If this is not
possible due to issues with stability or solubility,It is possible to add formic
acid, acetic acid, or salt to the Solubility can be increased by adding a
sample. These additives are not harmful. As long as the volume of The loaded
sample is small in comparison to the column.Volume. When large sample volumes
are used, the only effect Are used, there could be an additional peak or two
eluting in the After sample injection, the void volume is calculated.
Sample preparation is an essential part of
HPLC analysis, with the goal of producing a repeatable and homogeneous solution
suitable for injection onto the column. The column. The purpose of sample
preparation is to create a sample aliquot that,
•Is
relatively free of interferences,
•Will not
harm the column and
• Is it
compatible with the intended HPLC method that is, the sample solvent will
dissolve in the mobile phase without affecting sample retention or
resolution[8]
Method
optimization
Using
experimental design, identify the method’s “weaknesses” and optimise the
method. Learn how the Approach performs in a variety of settings, with varying
degrees of success Different instrument setups and samples are used. The vast
majority of HPLC technique development optimization has been completed. The
focus has been on optimising HPLC conditions. The Mobile and stationary phase
compositions The mobile phase has been
optimised. The optimization of parameters is always prioritised over the
optimization of parameters because it is much easier And more relaxed[9]
Method
validation
The
process of validating an analytical method is the process of determining that
the method’s performance characteristics meet the requirements for the intended
analytical application through laboratory studies. Any new or altered method
must be validated to ensure its effectiveness. That it can produce reproducible
and dependable results when used by different people Operators using the same
or different laboratory equipment. the kind of the validation programme that is
needed is entirely dependent on the specific method and its proposed
implementation.
The
results of method validation can be used to evaluate the quality, reliability,
and consistency of analytical results; it is a necessary component of any good
analytical practise. The use of equipment that is within specification,
operational, and calibrated properly is essential to the method validation
procedure. Analytical methods must be validated or revalidated Required.[10]
Components
of method validation
The
following are typical analytical performance characteristics which may be
tested during methods validation: [11]
Accuracy:
The
closeness of a measured value to the true or accepted value is referred to as
accuracy. Accuracy indicates the difference in mean value found and the true
value. It is decided by using the method on samples that are know Analyte in
various concentrations has been added. These ought to be compared to standard
and blank solutions to Make certain that there is no interference. The
precision is then calculated as a percentage from the test results of the
analyte recovered by the assay. It may occur frequently be expressed as the
assay recovery of known,additional analyte amounts.[12]
Precision
The
precision of an analytical procedure expresses the degree of agreement between
a series of measurements obtained from multiple samples of the same homogeneous
sample.Under the specified conditions, collect a sample. Precision can be
divided into three categories: Repeatability, intermediate precision, and
reproducibility are all important considerations. Precision should be
researched. Using homogeneous, authentic samples. However, if you are unable to
obtain a It may be investigated using artificially prepared samples or a sample
that is homogeneous. Solution The variance is commonly used to express the
precision of an analytical procedure. A series of measurements’ standard
deviation or coefficient of variation.[13]
(A)Repeatability
(1) A minimum of 9 determinations covering the
procedure’s specified range should be used to assess repeatability. (For
example, three concentrations with three replicates each); or
(2)At least six
determinations at 100% of the test concentration.
(B)Intermediate
Precision
The degree to which intermediate precision
should be established is determined by the circumstances in which the procedure
is to be used. The applicant must
Determine the impact of random events on the analytical procedure's
precision. Typical Days, analysts, and equipment are among the variables to be
investigated. It is not required to study. These effects on their own. It is
encouraged to use an experimental design (matrix).
(C)
Reproducibility
An interlaboratory trial is used to
assess reproducibility. When standardising an analytical procedure, for
example, reproducibility should be taken into account. Inclusion of procedures
in pharmacopoeias. These are not marketing data. Authorization dossier.
(D)Recommended
Data (5.
The standard deviation, relative standard
deviation (coefficient of variation), and confidence interval should be
reported for each type of precision investigated.[14]
Linearity:
A
method’s linearity refers to its ability to produce test results that are
directly proportional to the sample concentration over a given range. The
linear relationship between detector response (peak area and height) and sample
concentration is determined for HPLC methods. By dilution of standard stock or
separate weighing of drug substance, the relationship can be demonstrated
directly on drug substance. Using the proposed procedures, prepare the sample
components.
Linearity
should be assessed visually by inspecting a plot of signals as a function of
analyte concentration or content. If there is a linear relationship, test
results should be evaluated using appropriate statistical methods, such as
regression analysis. Data from the regression line It is useful to provide
mathematical estimates of the degree of linearity. It is typically expressed in
Terms of variance around the slope of regression line. In some cases, the
analytical responses Should be described by the appropriate function of analyte
concentration. The widely used Linearity ranges and acceptance criteria for
various pharmaceutical methods.[15]
Limit of
detection:
The LOQ is
determined by analysing samples with known analyte concentrations and
determining the minimum level at which the analyte can be reliably detected,
but not necessarily quantitated as a precise value, under the specified
experimental conditions. The detection limit is commonly expressed in terms of
Analyte concentration in the sample (ppm).The ICH recommends a number of
approaches for determining sample detection limits.Depending on the instrument
used for analysis, the nature of the analyte, and the method’s suitability. The
suitable Strategies are
Visual assessment.
Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).
The response’s standard deviation
The
standard deviation of the linearity plot’s slope.
The LOD
calculation formula is LOD = 3.3 δ/S
Where
δ = standard deviation of calibration curve intercepts.
S =denotes the slope of
linearity plot [16]
Limit of
Quantification (LOQ) –
The smallest amount of analyte in a sample
that can be quantified Determined with appropriate precision and Accuracy.in
the case of analytical procedures such as HPLC,Show baseline noise, and the LOQ
is generally Estimated from a S/N ratio determination (10:1) and is typically
confirmed by injection Standards that provide this S/N ratio while maintaining
an acceptable percent relative standard As well as deviation[17]
ROBUSTNESS
The
robustness of an analytical procedure is a measure of its ability to remain
unaffected by minor but deliberate changes in method parameters, and it
indicates its dependability.During normal operation.[18]
Specificity:
The
ability to clearly evaluate the substance in the presence of components that
might be anticipated to be present is known as specificity. Comparing the test
findings with samples of placebo particles obtained through sample analysis,
upgrade products, or sample analysis, without impurity, placebo components,
allows for the specification of the test method. Resolution between the analyte
peak and the other closely eluting peak is the greatest indicator of
specificity.[19]
REFERENCE
1.Yadav
Vidushi, Bharkatiya Meenakshi A REVIEW ON HPLC METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND
VALIDATION Peer review under responsibility of Life Science Informatics
Publications 2017 March- April RJLBPCS 2(6) Page No.166
2.Miral Patel1, Dharti
Patel, Keyur Ahir3, Sumer Singh4A Review: Development and validation of HPLC
method, J Pharm Sci Bioscientific Res. 2019. 9 (3):173-182
3 Santosh Kumar Bhardwaj
a,b , K. Dwivedia and D. D. Agarwala,A Review: HPLC Method Development and
Validation,International Journal of Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
2015; 5(4): 76-81
4.Miral Patel1, Dharti
Patel2, Keyur Ahir3, Sumer Singh4A Review: Development and validation of HPLC
method ,J Pharm Sci Bioscientific Res. 2019. 9 (3):173-182
5.Ms Pallavi Nemgonda
Patil HPLC METHOD DEVELOPMENT – A REVIEW,SGVU Journal of Pharmaceutical
Research & Education, 2017, 2(1), 243-260
6.Manjiri Shinde, Dr.
Satish Kumar,Dr.Arunabha Mallik,Dr. N Jyothi A REVIEW ON HPLC METHOD
DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION EPRA International Journal of Research and
Development (IJRD) October 2021
7 D. Satheeshkumar,M.
Gokul,S. Shalini,M. Ukeshraj, M. Mullaivendan ,HPLC method development and
validation – A review,International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and
Innovations in Technology ISSN: 2454-132X Impact Factor: 6.078 (Volume 7, Issue
3 - V7I3-1429)
8.Sanjay Kumar D and D.R.
Harish Kumar IMPORTANCE OF RP-HPLC IN ANALYTICAL METHOD DEVELOPMENT: A REVIEW
IJPSR, 2012; Vol. 3(12): 4626-4633
9.Priya Sadapha, Kavita
Dhamak Review Article on High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) Method
Development and Validation,Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res., 74(2), May - June
2022; Article No. 03, Pages: 23-29
10.P. M. Deshmukhe, M. S.
Charde, R. D. Chakole A Review on HPLC Method Development and
Validation,Ijppr.Human, 2021; Vol. 21 (4): 66-82.
11.Vikram Kumar, Rabijit
Bharadwaj, Gaurav Gupta, Shailesh Kumar,An Overview on HPLC Method Development,
Optimization and Validation process for drug analysis, The Pharmaceutical and
Chemical Journal, 2015, 2(2):30-40
12.Murugan S, Elayaraja
A, Niranjan Babu M, Chandrakala K, Prathap Naik K, Ramaiah P and Chathurya
.Vulchi,A REVIEW ON METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION BY USING HPLC
,INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NOVEL TRENDS IN PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES,VOLUME 3 |
NUMBER 3 | OCT | 2013
13.Pawan Tiwari and B. K.
Singh HPLC: A MODERN APPROACH OF DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION, World Journal of
Pharmaceutical Research,Volume 5, Issue 9, 1616-1631.
14.Validation of
Analytical Procedures: Methodology.ICH-Guidelines Q2B, Geneva. 1996; 11.
(CPMP/ICH/281/95)
15.Harshad V. Paithankar ,HPLC
METHOD VALIDATION FOR PHARMACEUTICALS: A REVIEW,International Journal of
Universal Pharmacy and Bio Sciences 2(4): July-August 2013.
16.Panchumarthy
Ravisankar Ch. Naga Navya1, D. Pravallika D. Navya Sri,A Review on Step-by-Step
Analytical Method Validation, .iosrphr.org Volume 5, Issue 10 (October 2015),
PP. 07-19
17.Kusum Mishra, B. K.
Sing,A Review on Method Development and Validation by Using HPLC International
Journal for Pharmaceutical Research Scholars (IJPRS),V-5, I-3, 2016
18.Ms Pallavi Nemgonda
Patil ,HPLC METHOD DEVELOPMENT - A REVIEW,Journal of Pharmaceutical Research &
Education, 2017, 2(1), 243-260
19.Punam S. Desai,
Rajeshwar V. Chavan, Nikita B. Amane, Sanmati D. Shete, Archana R. Dhole, High Performance
Liquid Chromatography – A Validation View,ASian J. Pharm. Ana. 2019;
9(4):232-236.