Review Policy

Peer Review Policy:


  • The journal employs a double-blind peer review process.
  • Editors conduct an initial review of all submissions to ensure they meet editorial policies and quality standards.
  • Submissions meeting these criteria are sent to two reviewers anonymously.
  • Reviewers' comments are confidential and anonymized before being passed on to the authors.
  • The Editorial Board makes a final decision on manuscript acceptability based on reviewer comments.
  • Authors may need to make significant revisions for acceptance.

Policy on Retraction of Articles:


Plagiarism Policy:
  • The journal checks for plagiarism using Turnitin Software.
  • Authors found guilty of plagiarism will be barred from publishing for six months.
  • Complaints about plagiarism can be submitted through a provided web link.

General Instructions

Authors must affirm that their manuscripts have not been previously published, except as abstracts or theses, and are not currently under review by another journal. The corresponding author is responsible for ensuring that all co-authors have agreed to the article's publication and for obtaining institutional approvals where necessary. We recommend electronic manuscript submissions, combining text, tables, and figures into a single Microsoft Word file. Correspondence and proofs will be sent to the corresponding author for review before publication, unless otherwise specified. Submission implies the authors' consent to editing for improved readability. Once proofs are prepared, adding or removing author names is not allowed. For inquiries regarding submitted or accepted papers, please contact the editor via email.